[mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8727 (7334)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 06 February 2023 22:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D5BC1575CF for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:53:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FqtqXdofHIUs for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A286C1575CC for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 7E58911E4FC; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:53:35 -0800 (PST)
To: takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp, rdd@cert.org, mio@nict.go.jp, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, ncamwing@cisco.com, takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: cabo@tzi.org, mile@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230206225335.7E58911E4FC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:53:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/39EbZrsxFjoh7j8qVK0E_wIQ03A>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:38:50 -0800
Subject: [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8727 (7334)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 22:53:40 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8727, "JSON Binding of the Incident Object Description Exchange Format". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7334 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Section: 6 Original Text ------------- {iodef-BusinessImpact => BusinessImpact / Corrected Text -------------- {iodef-BusinessImpact => BusinessImpact} / Notes ----- A closing brace is missing in this line of the rule for "Assessment". Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8727 (draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-14) -------------------------------------- Title : JSON Binding of the Incident Object Description Exchange Format Publication Date : August 2020 Author(s) : T. Takahashi, R. Danyliw, M. Suzuki Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8727 (7334) RFC Errata System