Re: [mile] Working group last call for ROLIE

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 28 April 2017 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06320129BAE for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qhc-JTVFpmjO for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8732A12EAEA for <mile@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id o3so13117448pgn.2 for <mile@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/iB2JHX+TeSy9Ykq6UqbeXZRe2l77xrhM2GBah9XF9o=; b=Zy6u1ELX7dFjGCrRXGhKCM1NT1vDOMXRBRS5gYHHw3PWi5SpC1mWqEgSPGnsxB34Xr SUMHroaYEikdlvzTZIGtpg+2nIz3jLZH/rlxyg+fvAc+JMPu9wRGWdaFoSvN7KvFcUu8 bRh59KsvXfCs8tTZE0DrBqsD77jkLZ0+ir0+OOayjhXh//+cEivE3aFFWn4XSMthwR7/ 70rd8asdHP4x9bbQ61wlBfSn68sVbA1MBN36eVVRBlztyLYDE0gP3MmP+eJy3tJrhn7V SmC8vtEBlOB6IeKRs8v9kmSB/f0p5Z7Q1gWqROR/rxCRb5pn4V4LJoygHvsZiXUeWvkd 2YWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/iB2JHX+TeSy9Ykq6UqbeXZRe2l77xrhM2GBah9XF9o=; b=OPlqIkTs7olz1L+Pk/5ZX6OpHrbtGXqf1Aax11iuUVLsoCQasjuvKdsP5knq0+rk3P HzIZ2EoA2iPCg9pA7/odmIDR49hsgV69uSXEElWYIOSWu0DnQD7fhURhQvK3GyTGdUX+ i5MsUQUoV+1jTF8qG9bmK9iYBjW3xUhIuDFSpWB/DJ+d1tIZHf7rln+TmbvYA/Oi+gB8 Q9nFafPU2Vgu0ikHEih6eLhUScMWPC1lrGAjBFC+ubqzUccD1rjMP7VgaEvkHkEvj32n CtVNlw/0D8OYB+rC2HNKikLaOH+Y5J6ub90oFY0cGC/0rx+GjhHYCkSiWb4PEJK8JHfB n+GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5VIijvziS2GDMTZi+BUBEEIf4yoC5g01KZ8CUh0wmFO+gd9HSP DJG4+u+u0w2A6Bwn9q/WB1+9ngnZAQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.245.1 with SMTP id i1mr11966501pll.51.1493402601066; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.185.143 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR09MB14401B51C5CE8734DFE009ACF0130@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CC7AB8C2-66EC-4B75-9CFA-F9A1D7A9C46D@cisco.com> <MWHPR09MB1440A8DB93D40DB75DD98DF9F0100@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <3471DC95-25F2-4CE5-9DCE-C19083EB54D0@cisco.com> <MWHPR09MB14401B51C5CE8734DFE009ACF0130@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:02:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6o0KULHxPJrEJ62Sa5MAoXarqpsyADxBbLXCSMOnbwDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
Cc: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/9B7MJ7oyDfmuGHjEZikCB_4-WwU>
Subject: Re: [mile] Working group last call for ROLIE
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:06:24 -0000

Hi Nancy,

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
<david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:
> Nancy,
>
>
>
> Thanks for agreeing to review. We are happy with how much review the draft
> is getting and are happy to see the WGLC delayed to allow it to receive more
> review. This will only help to improve the draft in the end.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) [mailto:ncamwing@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:43 PM
> To: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov>; mile@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Working group last call for ROLIE
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> I am starting a review of this draft too J
>
> I personally don’t have concerns, though that would also need to be
> reviewed….so we’d have to delay the WGLC hopefully not by much….but would be
> good to hear Kathleen as AD provide feedback as well…
>

I usually do my AD review after WGLC, when the draft is sent for IESG
publication.

Thanks,
Kathleen
>
>
>                 Nancy
>
> From: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
> Date: Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 1:27 PM
> To: "ncamwing@cisco.com" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile@ietf.org"
> <mile@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: Working group last call for ROLIE
>
>
>
> After talking with a few people, I have realized it might be a good idea to
> allow for a private use portion of the ROLIE property namespace defined in
> section 8.3. This would be in addition to the current specification required
> portion of the namespace. This would allow private extensions to be tried
> out on a local server basis. A registration of “property:local” could set
> aside the portion of the namespace for local use. Local properties could
> then follow the pattern “urn:ietf:params:rolie:property:local:{name}” where
> name is a locally used private property.
>
>
>
> Any concerns with adding this?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nancy Cam-Winget
> (ncamwing)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 7:27 PM
> To: mile@ietf.org
> Subject: [mile] Working group last call for ROLIE
>
>
>
> Colleagues,
>
>
>
> Given the significant changes made to the last draft, we are doing another
> 30day WGLC for
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mile-rolie-06
>
>
>
> Please provide comments before May 1st and provide your support and/ or
> raise any issue you feel are yet to be addressed.
>
>
>
> Regards, Nancy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mile mailing list
> mile@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen