Re: [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft at https://github.com/milewg/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef
Takahiko Nagata <nagata@lepidum.co.jp> Fri, 14 December 2018 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <nagata@lepidum.co.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D412D84D for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lepidum-co-jp.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaXMkeZSrBOh for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7801B1310D9 for <mile@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id j10so1356205pga.1 for <mile@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lepidum-co-jp.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYp95ghAcfpfRy34UsNR54UkcEB3JCLLiKSsG9aPvJU=; b=ED0PeR4aTn4RSGsShyZXbcNgZDHRf5U5l/0f9V9yyDWoEKid+g9vIcvqJpg168ywMb Fczn+nH683HwkbSgeHpKeTaQsdj6h/dVu4jXJqPeMlNjWdMHkEj3IPk9fc8jghcvOS5H bFOri7dJQKVLqwu1TY2JNuhYPwtZ0BWP84dG+E5uZbMVTfVpDkdJkwcN5Yqbwx4kEVDH CP9y9qjfYe2YeuA0E7h5OAgWv4uRcwg4t/D3qiE/jDYqYNGQs448+vQpUNI9r1tcXCw6 tVVRTt8wc3Zn4qZtn2A3iBivtwgYRDVK4kEZWBx67x5u+kgEt1QaFJReqRByf4eTcI1t R9tA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYp95ghAcfpfRy34UsNR54UkcEB3JCLLiKSsG9aPvJU=; b=PC1bkoUNymI4KiILijPptOdjAXU8v2v12qdrtMnVqGwxFQcpPH6dFSAtPkT1dtKjPw UpZNzbJuAs7IGymKUuPaqZxkotRyKSmLTmB1GHOd0BBGEv8JYaa0L8lhIdvev7cqovUS 1Inpl7OWC453zACy+NZkvgosyxlHapxZBK+27qMUxg01jtYvDROSeSJa2F1KCMT8oi/e SP2+jrqDdHilal/mXfVJZWeXxK8ukVpA1XJqqqo0Dg9Yxe/Xa0Uuv8CJPtMYXowgeJ+R b8OhKov5wcBwpXMzwAit8vewnZhfHfXnZ7FX8sUc4oi3KY4Z7c3GNPLXzEZZe+hBc67d UFEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbgDm1EseHs0yLEkUnnuBYDOztW7cNFu0vjWJNoPpBMv2TZbmcQ 0dDj4KauWOtHURzpKb15PP0ptnwzoEXr88SADhPIvibSaI9ho/4MUtre8PFlRluxJeivWETI5It iX6gKlMttjxjEuBot6Xk4P33zWtuJeTQELfuZXv200hHr2CoR2UNkjEF2ukw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VSoJEPVpDMCEleuqky+h68SVTHCWWRZCMMG6StbrPg66xVtrNBrTuNK683+BebMKHXIRMNVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:670f:: with SMTP id b15mr2406078pfc.212.1544785772577; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.30.105] ([150.249.212.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm16262813pfm.8.2018.12.14.03.09.31 for <mile@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:09:31 -0800 (PST)
To: 'MILE IETF' <mile@ietf.org>
References: <1c0f01d49120$8da50450$a8ef0cf0$@nict.go.jp>
From: Takahiko Nagata <nagata@lepidum.co.jp>
Message-ID: <cc80124b-cf82-40bf-fa6a-d21e10ea236e@lepidum.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:09:29 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1c0f01d49120$8da50450$a8ef0cf0$@nict.go.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/BaCSS969LllXrUC1jZKGVA7FXxM>
Subject: Re: [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft at https://github.com/milewg/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:36 -0000
Hi Take, I would like to 2 comments. (1) Should apply ErrataID: 5398 (AlternativeIndicatorID) Errata ID: 5398 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5398 CDDL in latest draft says: ``` AlternativeIndicatorID = { ? restriction: restriction .default "private" ? ext-restriction: text IndicatorReference: [+ IndicatorReference] } ``` It should say: ``` AlternativeIndicatorID = { ? restriction: restriction .default "private" ? ext-restriction: text IndicatorID: [+ IndicatorID] } ``` (2) [Question]DomainData, Address of Node should be exist at the same time? Errata ID: 5544 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5544 XML Schame in errata say: ``` <xs:element name="Node"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element ref="iodef:DomainData" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Address" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> ``` -->There is only either DomainData or Address. (NOT exists at the same time.) CDDL in latest draft says: ``` Node = { (DomainData:[+ DomainData] ? Address:[+ Address] // ? DomainData:[+ DomainData] Address:[+ Address]) ``` -->Exists at the same time. Maybe CDDL sytanx is correct and XML Schema of errata is wrong, I think. Because RFC7970 say: ``` DomainData Zero or more. The domain (DNS) information associated with this node. If an Address is not provided, at least one DomainData MUST be specified. See Section 3.19. ``` Best Regards, Takahiko Nagata On 2018/12/11 16:10, Takeshi Takahashi wrote: > Dear all, > > > > We have been developing the cbor/json IODEF draft > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-06), and its latest > version is available on the github: > https://github.com/milewg/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef > > > > We believe the draft is ready for the next step. > > To move forward, we need to get feedbacks from this community. > > > > Could you review the draft on the github and provide us any feedback, > please? > > The draft seems to be long, but most of the pages are CDDL data model and > the main body text is not long. > > > > We appreciate your kind assistance very much. > > > > Best regards, > > Take > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mile mailing list > mile@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile > -- ============================= 株式会社レピダム 永田 貴彦 Mail: nagata@lepidum.co.jp Tel: 03-6276-5103 〒151-0071 東京都渋谷区本町3-12-1 住友不動産西新宿ビル6号館 =============================
- [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft at … Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft… Takahiko Nagata
- Re: [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft… Takahiko Nagata
- Re: [mile] review request on the json IODEF draft… Takeshi Takahashi