[mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7970 (5544)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 04 November 2018 02:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1855B12F1AC for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 19:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNxbHq27awoo for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 19:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50ECA12F1A6 for <mile@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 19:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5C386B8106D; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 19:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, ekr@rtfm.com, ncamwing@cisco.com, takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp, mile@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20181104025632.5C386B8106D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 19:56:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/DinZSeJmhDdXgTDDal8d2yUnkcw>
Subject: [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7970 (5544)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 02:56:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7970, "The Incident Object Description Exchange Format Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5544 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- <xs:element name="Node"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element ref="iodef:DomainData" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Address" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element ref="iodef:PostalAddress" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Location" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Counter" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Corrected Text -------------- <xs:element name="Node"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element ref="iodef:DomainData" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Address" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:choice> <xs:element ref="iodef:PostalAddress" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Location" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xs:element ref="iodef:Counter" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Notes ----- Section 3.18 says as follows: "DomainData Zero or more. The domain (DNS) information associated with this node. If an Address is not provided, at least one DomainData MUST be specified. See Section 3.19. Address Zero or more. The hardware, network, or application address of the node. If a DomainData is not provided, at least one Address MUST be specified. See Section 3.18.1." To comply with the above definition, "minOccurs" attribute for both DomainData and Address elements need to be removed. (Current schema allows to omit both of the elements, but the RFC says that at least one of them need to be presented.) Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7970 (draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-26) -------------------------------------- Title : The Incident Object Description Exchange Format Version 2 Publication Date : November 2016 Author(s) : R. Danyliw Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7970 (5544) RFC Errata System
- Re: [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7970 (5… Roman Danyliw