IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 19 November 2019 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6340A120152; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:55:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2If0QpqYkd7d; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:55:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318C6120046; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:55:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2001:67c:370:128:219e:10cb:654d:3575]; authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1iWwUE-0005ED-5u; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:55:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <04f001d59e92$39f97040$adec50c0$@nict.go.jp>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:55:33 +0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, mile@ietf.org, mile-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB24B504-A51B-4A51-A61A-0FCBFB3206D9@kuehlewind.net>
References: <156717396117.25783.2109173969944534688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <04f001d59e92$39f97040$adec50c0$@nict.go.jp>
To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1574142944;7c8d01cd;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1iWwUE-0005ED-5u
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/N7S_SQ3lPprkqHSpMjRocXI-2U4>
Subject: Re: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:55:49 -0000

No worries. Thanks for the update!


> On 19. Nov 2019, at 12:31, Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja
> 
> Thank you for your kind review, and I am sorry for not being able to reply you earlier.
> 
> Here are the replies to your kind comments:
>> One quick question: Shouldn't this document reference RFC8259 (normatively)? Or is it see as sufficient that it is referenced indirectly by RFC8610?
> Thank you. I reflected your comments.
> 
>> And minor editorial comment: the introduction should probably also say something about CBOR.
> I agree. I've addressed CBOR in the introduction.
> 
> The new version is now posted below:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/
> 
> Thank you , and best regards,
> Take
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 7:06 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org; Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>; mile-chairs@ietf.org; ncamwing@cisco.com; mile@ietf.org
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> One quick question: Shouldn't this document reference RFC8259 (normatively)? Or is it see as sufficient that it is referenced indirectly by RFC8610?
> 
> And minor editorial comment: the introduction should probably also say something about CBOR.
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email