[mile] [IANA #911630] RE: Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22.txt> to Proposed Standard

["Amanda Baber via RT" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Roman,

One more question: should the contents of Section 10.2's "IV (Value)" column appear anywhere in the registry? For example, should it be the label for that registry's value column? For example, in the CDNI Payload Types registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/cdni-parameters, the label for the value column is "Payload Type." 

thanks,
Amanda

On Thu Jun 02 13:24:34 2016, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hello Amanda!
> 
> Sorry for the confusion.  Let me clarify below ...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:22 AM
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: [IANA #910912] Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-
> > 22.txt> to
> > Proposed Standard
> >
> > IESG:
> >
> > IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> > IANA Actions - NOT OK
> >
> > How to populate these 33 registries is unclear.
> >
> > For example, Section 3.9 says, “These values are maintained in the
> > ‘Contact-
> > role’ IANA registry per Section 10.2” and then presents a list of 19
> > items. Is
> > the “Contact-role” registry made up of the single entry in the IANA
> > Considerations table, as the IANA Considerations section seems to
> > indicate,
> > or does it consist of the 19 items in Section 3.9? If the latter,
> > where should
> > the entries in 10.2 table's "IV (Value)" column be placed?
> 
> Taking "Contact-role" as an example, the desired outcome is the
> following:
> 
> --[ snip ]--
> Registry name: Contact-role
> 
> Value, Description, Reference
> "creator", "The entity that generate the document.", RFC-num-of-this-
> document
> "reporter, "The entity that reported the information.", RFC-num-of-
> this-document
> "admin", "An administrative contact or business owner for an asset or
> organization.", RFC-num-of-this-document
> ... [ entry #4 - 18] ...
> "ext-value", "A value used to indicate that this attribute is extended
> and the actual value is provided using the corresponding ext-*
> attribute." , RFC-num-of-this-document
> --[ snip ]--
> 
> Yes, each enumerate value will be a distinct entry in a given
> registry.  Contact-role would have 19 entries.
> 
> I realized that there is no text saying that a reference to this
> document should be added to each registry entries in the Reference
> column.
> 
> Roman