[mile] AD review of draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-08

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay, I have read the draft a couple of months ago, but 
didn't get around to writing down my review comments. Finally, here they 
are:

In the Introduction:

    IODEF JSON provides all of the expressivity of IODEF XML.  It gives
    implementers and operators an alternative format to exchange the same
    information.

I find the document is lacking some text about motivation for doing the 
JSON representation. Can some text be added? Otherwise I can see other 
people would ask why bother?


In 2.1: ENUM

"ENUM"  is only defined in draft-zyp-json-schema-03, however 
draft-zyp-json-schema-04 has removed it. The draft is expired. I think 
you need a proper normative reference here or maybe you decide to remove 
this from the document.


Please use RFC 8610 as the reference for CDDL.


In Section 2.2.2:

URL needs a reference. Probably RFC 3986.

In Section 2.2.3:

    The STRUCTUREDINFO data
    type is implemented as an object with "SpecID", "ext-SpecID",

    "ContentID", "dtype", "RawData", "Reference" elements.

Maybe I am confused, but in Section 5 I don't see "dtype" to be defined 
as a member of StructuredInfo.


In the same section:

"base64" needs a normative reference to RFC 4648. Please also include 
the section reference (Section 4 of RFC 4648 for base64 encoding or 
Section 5 of RFC 4648 for URL-safe base64 encoding).



In Section 3.2:

    o  This document treats attributes and elements of each class defined
       in [RFC7970] equally

Can you please clarify what you mean by "equally" in this context?

       and is agnostic on the order of their

       appearances.

In the same section:

Typo: reprensetend (should be "represented")


I realized that the same issue is present in the XML mapping, but can 
you clarify what would be the content of "EmailBody" is an email message 
has complicated MIME structure and includes multiple body parts?


Appendix B: can you please clarify whether this is Normative or Informative?


Thank you,

Alexey