Re: [mile] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC5C120846; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaRT_sTvIUDq; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:19:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr660092.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.66.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3CDE120829; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:19:48 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=nyUpSSn1rO0I5dkBNaaQbVRGkrAGjSNNXnrXXnaUWFaf5YN/a9ii78T9NO+gfLEHKGD5Cmo6TWiToGq/cPtKIQMuUZEt5qWkoKMNUfZG8oATKGnqqOAKDFrMFn0um8z+cKURvj86n9/Pch3HwBMESmSLMHaJrdMyzDJP870uMPn3MxFFi/XJ0dvsouKXx00Toqsf/MPovml9qiPogC0OGkwUA8d9rtLbY2+pN7FuKsUTt1Wh01jx+dXGfHzfQsmYPmID1BdQfN6XDvlpVbmF0mywfg95rrT/izL54uXWkM6sfdlzULVEkzsENB/01Hc7w3G7quTXuzAMvQr6OQ2ylA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7h2eUCXWMnvtg+TXNsilq5OqUJy/dpcVBJQW1W/E0xc=; b=l3Qtm/U8xAgEjUS1Jx97Zpq7rdxSGw0jbVuhuJ5xZJeGHY3Sh9EnUal9wiqD4rsoNk0/Nl1xr+WH0L2co0HcZysf/0yvPW7gKzS259LX0MuMzz0xvVUbW0SglyGCsaHOAScOf0KGrz1p4XjAnZ/eRTTJypYLaXRL5AXrM3sEOI5o8vYt6QuW38moW9LspLocw0Mc0Apk8+MWiNYwgVUVppayiuFm1nxaYdFbnbePCNWhMttgJ1f/Gme9NByfspkxldVzQlvPVy87aJ1Yow1RywEAImtvKfqA5+xojEqP0Rc4lV3QkzzosnFChUw81kj7Ted+Pmt8h15g9JLXIz3zWQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kaloom.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=kaloom.com; dkim=pass header.d=kaloom.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7h2eUCXWMnvtg+TXNsilq5OqUJy/dpcVBJQW1W/E0xc=; b=Z4Cp2xqB5hmeoYE6Ufy9OHU4dqAALLtQe75Ik/7thVeORE0fG45t/0U9ptHTWOQ5wwthn5trDDP96GWecRIzgrXtkK1q4op8bmvSPSCDA2vYkO+s5s6gBvw9noF4RAAZ+nwzaTTsRMUnMjBqcRwXMTe8p1aNmBN62r+7d767/G4=
Received: from YQXPR01MB2888.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.92.18) by YQXPR01MB3943.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.92.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2451.30; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:46 +0000
Received: from YQXPR01MB2888.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::acb3:189b:a4a9:a387]) by YQXPR01MB2888.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::acb3:189b:a4a9:a387%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2451.031; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:46 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org>, Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQKuoc6tIXShaX5k7hDTyBSkDeYH+6Xf4OOggAAeKgA=
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:46 +0000
Message-ID: <D9678E4D-8900-469E-BC72-A05A2ACED36A@kaloom.com>
References: <156753980990.20413.191085760147429684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <04fd01d59e92$892eb0d0$9b8c1270$@nict.go.jp>
In-Reply-To: <04fd01d59e92$892eb0d0$9b8c1270$@nict.go.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [31.133.137.116]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 78ca1724-9126-4472-ca6e-08d76cb87990
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YQXPR01MB3943:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YQXPR01MB39433CC61809D09D9B4E12A2B44C0@YQXPR01MB3943.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 022649CC2C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39840400004)(396003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(486006)(4326008)(6486002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(33656002)(81156014)(8936002)(6512007)(81166006)(36756003)(76176011)(66556008)(102836004)(2906002)(66446008)(8676002)(64756008)(76116006)(91956017)(316002)(6506007)(53546011)(6116002)(186003)(3846002)(14444005)(54906003)(256004)(66476007)(5660300002)(26005)(99286004)(66946007)(966005)(80792005)(86362001)(508600001)(229853002)(476003)(11346002)(6916009)(446003)(14454004)(6436002)(6246003)(25786009)(7736002)(305945005)(66066001)(6306002)(2616005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YQXPR01MB3943; H:YQXPR01MB2888.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: jU/BZHgHfFa0m+daNarEn57zpSKX4l00j38XnprAlTjN7elWpcSSCKC7TcT43zJRg69olvPDZ+uDnOKl7/Aq+1ejynFJLOzL2VhkdvexoUAElAlhAeRCEG2YRqb2H7SsIOHeyFYopk7bHf4uJfekaxkhNBNHarxUKdisFeccggAYDvbysqFQQzUDN4CA/DQWpjNDxSaXO9jjQPCF0D9GlKq5mvcS40oVM/TDJc2QwU6NJHalDkPDF/xnrn8tgEC0T0SIslgeJQHMbDGdeiO9mTtDF8Oe7Deroe8IQ+BxCBJEgGEfbMZobU8Nh31JsRWPFvpoFZufMKXAV496HUfd6Ga/crsBt2cdO2uZKdwzIUkRLyR2pHK9Zj68qXhEKaPpovC9/08RP8IE0EW1pikAQqYD1i2S3+ll5KnJSZJMcFlWUEezdcoJGflcQxrKJnN3
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <510DDD15DD845D41BAB10764FCB79CC9@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 78ca1724-9126-4472-ca6e-08d76cb87990
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2019 06:19:46.4669 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: iHQTDUpaVzvJmyuszVyehpE9SC7J7dvve8QeLLRA/SCyQBLoqw5Yo0+OxO6p4ojsGwbfdP3XOUZfyO0EO2zKRA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQXPR01MB3943
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/YZGIkjjgruNb0C2PjJkPJ8WkM8I>
Subject: Re: [mile] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:55 -0000

Thank you Takahashi-san. The added text addresses my concern. I have cleared.

Regards
Suresh

> On Nov 19, 2019, at 12:33 PM, Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Thank you for your kind review, and I am sorry for not being able to reply you earlier.
> Let me reply your comments here.
> 
>> * Section 5 (CDDL) and Appendix B (JSON schema)
>> 
>> I am trying to understand how "ipv6-net-mask" will be used since there is no such thing, and "ipv6-net" already covers the only possible way of denoting prefixes. Can you please clarify why and how you intend to use this? I remember reading and balloting on RFC7970 and it did not (IMHO rightly) have a category for this.
> 
> Yes, we agree on the point.
> Since I would like to maintain compatibility with rfc7970 that still has "ipv6-net-mask", we kept it in the revised version of the draft.
> 
> Nevertheless, the point you raised is important, thus we added one sentence in Section 3.2 "The "ipv6-net-mask" type attribute of BulkObservable class remains available for the backward compatibility purpose, but the use of this attribute is not recommended because IPV6 does not use netmask any more."
> 
> I hope this description is ok for you.
> 
> The revised version is available below:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/
> 
> Thank you, and kind regards,
> Take
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 12:43 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
> Cc: draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org; Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>;; mile-chairs@ietf.org; ncamwing@cisco.com; mile@ietf.org
> Subject: Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * Section 5 (CDDL) and Appendix B (JSON schema)
> 
> I am trying to understand how "ipv6-net-mask" will be used since there is no such thing, and "ipv6-net" already covers the only possible way of denoting prefixes. Can you please clarify why and how you intend to use this? I remember reading and balloting on RFC7970 and it did not (IMHO rightly) have a category for this.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>