Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0636131CB2 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 13:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82VFjT2NIgNZ for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2ED129B34 for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10550; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1501793751; x=1503003351; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=XMgO5HiPPba8kmlVFFS32ZXIxsc7W9lemnYBdBML8NI=; b=h1NbCAZlu2cXfS9LZLSO2d/T4EnToha39Xk/syuOHwR+lGSBo38Bho2P 85qK6SHbh9Yg+IbyF3RYJ79xNWF4Bq0ppwGGBetmazi5ulPMgql3HOp7Y XZpaxYyHlxbu+xcoiPJ/7eSxs4ohTZHujoeC6zPAAJx/mogO+UDth8hWZ 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CGAQDsjINZ/5tdJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9rZG0nB44IkAiBbpBihTOCEiyFGwIahCQ/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRgBAQEBAyMKXAIBCBEEAQEoAwICAjAUCQgCBAESCIlDZBCtVYImJ4sbAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDKIICgUyBY4MnhFMBAVSCXYJhBZ99AodRg0yJBYIYhViKYZYAAR84P0t3FUmHGnaHFYEjgQ8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,317,1498521600"; d="scan'208,217";a="464110667"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2017 20:55:50 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v73KtoCV023080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:55:50 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:55:49 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:55:49 -0500
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ROLIE for Standards track?
Thread-Index: AQHTC+zN6wlv0xzHFkSqq1oFy/1Ny6JzHd6w
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 20:55:49 +0000
Message-ID: <7933b1e60e344c6db7dceda93b357fe3@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <C5A1DE61-B7D0-4238-ADF9-7AE825FA32FB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5A1DE61-B7D0-4238-ADF9-7AE825FA32FB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.108.7]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7933b1e60e344c6db7dceda93b357fe3XCHALN010ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/aSMZtmdNLNo0qYs9Yi-Q3Nsb8Jo>
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 20:55:53 -0000
+1 for standards track. From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 8:10 PM To: mile@ietf.org Subject: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Hi, Back in IETF 97 (Seoul), we discussed moving ROLIE from Informational to Standards track with participants being in favor. However, I was remiss in confirming this over the mail list….SO, In order to move this forward as I think the draft is ready other than its category. I’d like to ask the mail list: - Should MILE adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rolie/ as a Standards track document? Please respond by August 16th so that we can move this item forward. Kind regards, Nancy
- [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Adam Montville
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? John Field
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)