Re: [mile] [IANA #910912] Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22.txt> to Proposed Standard

["Roman D. Danyliw" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Amanda!

Sorry for the confusion.  Let me clarify below ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:22 AM
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [IANA #910912] Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22.txt> to
> Proposed Standard
> 
> IESG:
> 
> IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> IANA Actions - NOT OK
> 
> How to populate these 33 registries is unclear.
> 
> For example, Section 3.9 says, “These values are maintained in the ‘Contact-
> role’ IANA registry per Section 10.2” and then presents a list of 19 items. Is
> the “Contact-role” registry made up of the single entry in the IANA
> Considerations table, as the IANA Considerations section seems to indicate,
> or does it consist of the 19 items in Section 3.9? If the latter, where should
> the entries in 10.2 table's "IV (Value)" column be placed?

Taking "Contact-role" as an example, the desired outcome is the following:

--[ snip ]--
Registry name: Contact-role

Value, Description, Reference
"creator", "The entity that generate the document.", RFC-num-of-this-document
"reporter, "The entity that reported the information.", RFC-num-of-this-document
"admin", "An administrative contact or business owner for an asset or organization.", RFC-num-of-this-document
... [ entry #4 - 18] ...
"ext-value", "A value used to indicate that this attribute is extended and the actual value is provided using the corresponding ext-* attribute." , RFC-num-of-this-document
--[ snip ]--

Yes, each enumerate value will be a distinct entry in a given registry.  Contact-role would have 19 entries.

I realized that there is no text saying that a reference to this document should be added to each registry entries in the Reference column.

Roman