IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 22 June 2016 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAC812DB3E; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXuL1IuqJPMx; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D4C12D909; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c2so46203246vkg.1; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lX5bpdC0Th/64aALLeuJwejWJqkoHNJPpyLsyKlW00c=; b=sw9usIZZ+AvmOQE6WKMxAtlHu0Ph5J5zvCbeEIABhIZmP9bR0l7FTqLPc6T3po6aTh RhWkqf3DWCtpxtPRNzqPVxJM2xlMKcmxHiLgBAh8S7fvSMstiahmw7kpVZcGVN0B6gWM aiPxt/aOJJcspPpC25oVktUyBScaV0cx/Dj2W4atXDSCnXlX5vtWZK57uhuYBzzBTPFC +IGCx7WiDS5RV1chA6H47RyF8NbLO1tEfRJMZ8H8eqP19g4WVs7vm4RVIG6b8G0QwoMM g0Qp2N4C9Tnc2n+0nVlq6Ny13UECJ+bYGYkxJr/muxi+PRionZo/7LJCIIi+9mwTt1uh E1ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lX5bpdC0Th/64aALLeuJwejWJqkoHNJPpyLsyKlW00c=; b=YoHQ/eT4UU7eaDMEIFnbBqgr06+dZP69a8WpCPJ/Hy5FoYYT2xlZYaNIbosFImIa2k 3CWx0E0P2Ecl6v2IWutHuceYuPsem8WSqmPX0GKgPnPcUuZ7IXvnt14dOFWgKiE5aTGi tgAikNz9MJPJAuwvJnxgN78OMP1Uzlezgc336VYVxWpqdkOx77cT3pqd+H4bT14G1ugF keSsFdJlzY+7itk+1tB+wY2vpnmKZjSoPBwCIbIh0wuRKdY7W4be3QD5PdQc+DFN06cg lxegeo0bA2IYWgakM8z/Kl3rNnBHP3lR0WLZ2JYiZKOGVI0ik1zIQ6B94LWt5TDu1hLg v5zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKiRuw9qigk3w95FFLuq8b6X6V65fsnboFk91G9DKI5NuuXoCo5ETkpxXohZR/+/gIZdkCw3hQ1JohSLA==
X-Received: by 10.31.64.76 with SMTP id n73mr13389121vka.42.1466625233095; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.36.236 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD976686D@marathon>
References: <20160601073339.16171.59393.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD974F85C@marathon> <1464858290.1234564.625673017.7541014D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD97500C7@marathon> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD976686D@marathon>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:53:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH54VwDJsoTFBik6Tr20WCHNgXea1DMzcHGQiBK_dMV8bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/kRutwbCDI57R6a7beBULpJQDrXA>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mile] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:53:57 -0000

Hi Alexey,

Do the recent updates address your concerns?

Thanks,
Kathleen

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Roman D. Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
> Hi Alexey!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roman D. Danyliw [mailto:rdd@cert.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:22 AM
>> To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> [snip]
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm]
>> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 5:05 AM
>> > To: Roman D. Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> > Cc: mile@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org;
>> > takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp; mile-chairs@ietf.org; mile-
>> > chairs@tools.ietf.org
>> > Subject: Re: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22:
>> > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > > > COMMENT:
>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > --
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > In 3.29.3.1: there is still a reference to RFC 822 (should be RFC
>> > > > 5322)
>> > >
>> > > Actually, per Stephen's COMMENT on EAI
>> > >
>> >
>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/N52_1W9aXRw6gZSEqu0Y_vFuF
>> > h
>> > > 0),
>> > > this likely needs to be RFC5336.
>> >
>> > Yes. Maybe keep both references?
>>
>> Makes sense.  I'll add in both 5322 and 5336.
>
> The updated text in -23 reads as follows:
>
> 2.12.  Email String
>
>    An email address is represented in the information model by the EMAIL
>    data type.  The format of the EMAIL data type is documented in
>    Section 3.4.1 of [RFC5322] and Section 3.3 of [RFC6531].
>
> 3.18.1.  Address Class
> [snip]
>       3.   e-mail.  Email address, per the EMAIL data type.
>
> 3.29.3.1.  BulkObservable Class
> [snip]
>       3.   e-mail.  Email address (per the Address@category attribute).
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email