Re: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Tue, 19 November 2019 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BCF120818; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:31:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nict.go.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYrdHtQTQ210; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo-csw.securemx.jp (mo-csw1116.securemx.jp [210.130.202.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B5512006F; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:31:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1;a=rsa-sha256;c=relaxed/simple;d=nict.go.jp;h=From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding;i=takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp;s=20190225.smx;t= 1574137899; x=1575347499; bh=hK8joZHO6ShwXt7GhjOjpYa6LC6D5rl0xgfTx9ZVoX8=; b=SpF UOyrVDbppfag+5RJZVkzWTzJzj+TgFHCbPSbOyE9Y45XzVNpA04SuQ0TLwM5ihdt3NfvWQWJsbNgm BtBPLXwxFAv9zKYRorKFrb0yfZcRUOH8uFahKg0T0JRUxIeGXjPl1vXu37KdXyATUokP9HDmzE7yJ W7dtfesx3dlXAlqxgGDNyAa/9n+KMpiAGyIlSD/31IvukKQembWyDq2r/msWYqCBvyhzIRmvsB8kH NVusEnznE/maE97g5DkQdBScb9tBErIk8DtF9+h5ihB6bBkF7SOA175VNgIhAkZm4aEXw8ZZe4pMo Mj8ReBTVprQ1tnHFdet/R8a9aF5OatA==;
Received: by mo-csw.securemx.jp (mx-mo-csw1116) id xAJ4Vcqt024226; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:31:38 +0900
X-Iguazu-Qid: 2wHHQH54m4FVIpGRvS
X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1574137897; q=2wHHQH54m4FVIpGRvS; m=+TbZ9Cptqm1PldDJlzjTRVwYdxk7kULr09va9/lfCCY=
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (mail2.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.15]) by relay.securemx.jp (mx-mr1112) id xAJ4Vbx1004871 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:31:37 +0900
Received: from LAPTOP9DLCDU5S (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail Spool Server2) with ESMTPSA id E543C2E25E; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:31:35 +0900 (JST)
From: "Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: "=?utf-8?Q?'Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind'?=" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org>, "'Nancy Cam-Winget'" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, <mile-chairs@ietf.org>, <mile@ietf.org>
References: <156717396117.25783.2109173969944534688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156717396117.25783.2109173969944534688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:31:32 -0800
Message-ID: <04f001d59e92$39f97040$adec50c0$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQH8LST1+JXD0WI8ixtw9xpteAdhC6dEyRTw
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/kppILdGon-mI_rkzZeeWYjd7o10>
Subject: Re: [mile] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:31:51 -0000

Hi Mirja

Thank you for your kind review, and I am sorry for not being able to reply you earlier.

Here are the replies to your kind comments:
> One quick question: Shouldn't this document reference RFC8259 (normatively)? Or is it see as sufficient that it is referenced indirectly by RFC8610?
Thank you. I reflected your comments.

> And minor editorial comment: the introduction should probably also say something about CBOR.
I agree. I've addressed CBOR in the introduction.

The new version is now posted below:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/

Thank you , and best regards,
Take

-----Original Message-----
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 7:06 AM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org; Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>om>; mile-chairs@ietf.org; ncamwing@cisco.com; mile@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One quick question: Shouldn't this document reference RFC8259 (normatively)? Or is it see as sufficient that it is referenced indirectly by RFC8610?

And minor editorial comment: the introduction should probably also say something about CBOR.