Re: [mile] AD review of Implementation draft

[Daisuke MIYAMOTO <[e-mail]>]

Hello!

 The revised version is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-implementreport/

> Section 1:
> 
> We'll have trouble with http://siis.realmv6.org/implementations/ as a
> stable reference, but I'm not sure what to do about that and will get
> back to you.

Thanks, current revision still includes this URL.

> Consider changing from:
>    REN-ISAC also recommends to use of the IODEF attachment provided with
>    the notification email be processed rather than relying on parsing of
>    the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
>    for dealing with such email.
> To:
>    REN-ISAC also recommends to use an IODEF attachment provided with
>    a notification email for processing rather than relying on parsing of
>    the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
>    to handle such email.

I concur.

> Section 6.2
> Is IDMEF expanded anywhere?  What is SNML?

IDMEF is RFC4765. I also added a reference for RFC4765.

 In addition to that, I amended list items in Section 1
(Introduction), in order to add appropriate references
and adjust their order. (5070, 5070-bis, 5901, 5941, 6545,
6546, and 7203)

#This is just a confirmation rather than question, but
#shall we decide an abbreviated title of the draft asap?

Many thanks,
Daisuke

-- 
Daisuke MIYAMOTO
 / Assist. Prof., ITC, The University of Tokyo
mailto: [e-mail]