[mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 30 August 2019 14:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org, Nancy Cam-Winget <ncamwing@cisco.com>, mile-chairs@ietf.org, ncamwing@cisco.com, mile@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <156717396117.25783.2109173969944534688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:06:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/r2uVQlPl_TzWOZLJtg8iFpFt6N4>
Subject: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One quick question: Shouldn't this document reference RFC8259 (normatively)? Or
is it see as sufficient that it is referenced indirectly by RFC8610?

And minor editorial comment: the introduction should probably also say
something about CBOR.

[mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
Re: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Takeshi Takahashi
Re: [mile] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind