Re: [mile] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Tue, 19 November 2019 04:36 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FF912008A; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:36:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nict.go.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMdTn3zHb8No; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo-csw.securemx.jp (mo-csw1116.securemx.jp [210.130.202.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 555B812006F; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:36:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1;a=rsa-sha256;c=relaxed/simple;d=nict.go.jp;h=From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding;i=takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp;s=20190225.smx;t= 1574138167; x=1575347767; bh=9uZbwrZ3sJzYHWxl+M9hKDDXSpLYIKOi0H2td/9i+H0=; b=Kx5 V5OYG+rWWAQA+KASH3iMsvoTruDP56MJo0Cds3OXD/5Ow/TrOMgtM1nF9Zo+P6y5yajO6yZrp9F/h aYdwi3E74kAMFqCT/xFze6dcY2zkpsKPGDx91/5tYR6NYjhaRzOBL9iXw4unlLozgv9XREZgTKj0e dkM7zIylhMNmLcdeJidbTIOTgtM0aa7Qz/paNicD2sFcprS4krggUHdul0jtrovRq1RwmZ3/8bOtc Lv+N9lD6dSh7AQc5J0j3ymmhX9kdaCVTK1HA/3Hp4iSm8kgwBPUD4ZQyMB9CITyqyCqWq82GcmMaI JMK/TkI4E0HBJclS1quE0bW6w6Y5R6A==;
Received: by mo-csw.securemx.jp (mx-mo-csw1116) id xAJ4a6qW005981; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:36:07 +0900
X-Iguazu-Qid: 2wHHzjVf4JX7sCtOfk
X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1574138165; q=2wHHzjVf4JX7sCtOfk; m=u9RxjN6XcL/f4uULCPVv26962oERfSteFX4+Hqluoac=
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (ipv6.mail2.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:1200::f]) by relay.securemx.jp (mx-mr1113) id xAJ4a3jh037885 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:36:04 +0900
Received: from LAPTOP9DLCDU5S (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail Spool Server2) with ESMTPSA id AEC082E397; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:36:02 +0900 (JST)
From: "Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: "'Alexey Melnikov'" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "'Adam Roach'" <adam@nostrum.com>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <mile@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org>, <mile-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <156764400102.22766.2419644463294804047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4b81d295-2937-40a4-8e0c-8a3b132dbcb6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4b81d295-2937-40a4-8e0c-8a3b132dbcb6@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:35:59 -0800
Message-ID: <050d01d59e92$d8f5d120$8ae17360$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGe4S2x2wyb/6JXmh4BSy8XWqSGEgDNYw05p/j4AjA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/rtgvf-qkwitxbP7lE4hG4Np6zzs>
Subject: Re: [mile] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:36:20 -0000

Hi Adam and Alexey

Thank you for your kind review, and I am sorry for not being able to reply
you earlier.
I have reflected all the reference problem you kindly raised here.
I hope the draft looks fine now.

The revised version is available below:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/

Thank you, and best regards,
Take


-----Original Message-----
From: mile <mile-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 5:14 AM
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>om>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: mile@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef@ietf.org; mile-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mile] Adam Roach's No Objection on
draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef-10: (with COMMENT)

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote:
> Thanks for the work people put into this document. I have very little 
> to add to what has already been commented on by other IESG members, 
> although id-nits did turn up some issues regarding the version of JSON 
> being cited, and the apparent omission of a citation to RFC 8259 in the
Normative Dependency section:
> 
>   == Missing Reference: 'RFC8259' is mentioned on line 157, but not 
> defined
> 
>   == Missing Reference: 'RFC7159' is mentioned on line 202, but not 
> defined
> 
>   ** Obsolete undefined reference: RFC 7159 (Obsoleted by RFC 8259)

Good point, this needs to be fixed.

_______________________________________________
mile mailing list
mile@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile