[mile] implementation of RFC5070-bis
"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Tue, 19 April 2016 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B07812D9C8 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lq5--7D7RO_q for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE4312EAC1 for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id u3J1MNVv059190 for <mile@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: from VAIO (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id u3J1MNZt059185 for <mile@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0900 (JST)
From: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: mile@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:22:25 +0900
Message-ID: <012a01d199d9$ee201d10$ca605730$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGZ2Qpaie/o7ZR6Syqx7KOubymymQ==
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at zenith1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/s8CAWMYxe7P5MEUAvo1XGPoYua8>
Subject: [mile] implementation of RFC5070-bis
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:22:28 -0000
Hello all, I am wondering if anybody knows the implementation of RFC5070-bis, or if anybody is interested in implementing it, please kindly let us know about that. We already know that an implementation already support RFC5070-bis, as mentioned in the draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-06 draft, but it would be helpful to know more of such implementations. Thank you, Take
- [mile] implementation of RFC5070-bis Takeshi Takahashi