[mile] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6545 (5588)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 28 January 2019 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5BD12D4F3; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:01:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jyNkU323I6D; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B15129B88; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3CBADB8248C; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:01:30 -0800 (PST)
To: logan.widick@gmail.com, Kathleen.Moriarty@emc.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: kaduk@mit.edu, iesg@ietf.org, mile@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20190128000130.3CBADB8248C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/sJShFcpqFlj2Rbr_62AJQ7yKfIg>
Subject: [mile] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6545 (5588)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:01:39 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6545, "Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5588

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Logan Widick <logan.widick@gmail.com>;
Date Reported: 2018-12-28
Held by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)

Section: 5.1

Original Text
-------------
Page 18 says:

PolicyRegion

      One or many.  REQUIRED.  The values for the attribute "region" are
      used to determine what policy area may require consideration
      before a trace can be approved.  The PolicyRegion may include
      multiple selections from the attribute list in order to fit all
      possible policy considerations when crossing regions, consortiums,
      or networks.

   region

      One or many.  REQUIRED.  ENUM.  The attribute region is used to
      identify the expected sharing range of the incident information.
      The region may be within a region or defined by existing
      relationships such as those of a consortium or a client to a
      service provider.

Corrected Text
--------------
Page 18 should say:

PolicyRegion

      One or many.  REQUIRED.  The values for the attribute "region" are
      used to determine what policy area may require consideration
      before a trace can be approved.  The PolicyRegion may include
      multiple selections from the attribute list in order to fit all
      possible policy considerations when crossing regions, consortiums,
      or networks.

   region

      One.  REQUIRED.  ENUM.  The attribute region is used to
      identify the expected sharing range of the incident information.
      The region may be within a region or defined by existing
      relationships such as those of a consortium or a client to a
      service provider.

Notes
-----
The text as written (with "One or many" instances of the "region" attribute) suggests that 
<PolicyRegion region="ClientToSP" region="SPToClient"/> 
would be legal. 

However, the schema (Section 8) and the fact that a single XML tag can't contain more than one instance of a given attribute (see https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#uniqattspec, "An attribute name MUST NOT appear more than once in the same start-tag or empty-element tag") indicate that the above example of a PolicyRegion is not legal, and would need to be replaced with:
<PolicyRegion region="ClientToSP"/>
<PolicyRegion region="SPToClient"/> 

--------------------------------------
RFC6545 (draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
Publication Date    : April 2012
Author(s)           : K. Moriarty
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG