IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)

"Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 02 June 2016 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB2112D57C; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bCmfl1K8fScc; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (plainfield.sei.cmu.edu [192.58.107.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714C712B018; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.22]) by plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id u525OMrc017222; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:24:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cert.org; s=jthatj15xw2j; t=1464845062; bh=MAxAbQ0mVTEnIi522xoJ0vKuaoQvcHqjxA4JhHzSFW8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: References; b=RoGIlGemJnzal40FSxATiUVeKwv/oD/yhq584Jn75V6Jj/xifpM09RwZdTeh6hxUI R70ShZn+X0N95+Zj61+NtRxjvkw7rhAWux1/0WSlFJxQSejtvZU2RiR+Te494znr1e 4wabUvc5MK89jp2vHi7DxN+cy2VTy7UyRD6mUNTE=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id u525OMo6006021; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:24:22 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:24:21 -0400
From: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
To: "ben@nostrum.com" <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AdG8jsF+uHHxaB82TQ+jAK6PWROrbg==
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 05:24:20 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD974F8BF@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/sWm_dQUbJhG7nSXalKarI8vvd9w>
Cc: "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>, "mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mile] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 05:24:25 -0000

Hello Ben!

Thanks for your review.  My response is inline ...

> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wed, 01 June 2016 13:43 UTC
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org; Roman D. Danyliw 
> <rdd@cert.org>; mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org; mile@ietf.org; 
> mile-chairs@ietf.org; takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp; mile@ietf.org
> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: 
> (with COMMENT)
 
[snip]

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I concur with Alissa's and Alexey's discuss points.
> 
> Additionally, I think the rest of the points in Robert Spark's secdir review[1]
> deserve responses.

A response to Robert's review can be found here:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/hSH9Ot6L_VTb9zYcJNZzO_c-7dc

Note: I posed a few questions back to the working group, so not everything is resolved.

Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email