Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
"Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 02 June 2016 13:33 UTC
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A4C12D50B; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 06:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jI5e7tbPUZ4; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 06:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (plainfield.sei.cmu.edu [192.58.107.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA3A12D1A3; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 06:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.22]) by plainfield.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id u52DX9Ng024823; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:33:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cert.org; s=jthatj15xw2j; t=1464874389; bh=TBcdxXged8QA46beD7RL+hIoh0M21ksox6DmiXL4E3g=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Sender: Reply-To; b=fbTcL4cMblPh6aHjlvLAiz9dxLmQulRCHzrcmnD/bfyxuF0IrGwkMpijpd/IoR0Ob HJqvMd2K7nJnvDFBxajtMwfQ1r7SexlPpNruY5Te4QPfek+dodkqvbybJF4v3oIEyO RiJxpWxCTOaWKcUXtOjToUyfkcclEi2nGkbJyPdg=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id u52DX5b3014324; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:33:05 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:33:05 -0400
From: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRu4TrH9mJeraDUE+4D0d/zhuma5/WKbZg
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:33:05 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD97501F6@marathon>
References: <20160531212421.20304.86048.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160531212421.20304.86048.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/sYXKYWdoC8thm1xnI0iwkpxVrxs>
Cc: "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:33:14 -0000
Hello Alvaro! Thanks for the review. A response is below ... > -----Original Message----- > From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 5:24 PM > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org; mile-chairs@ietf.org; > takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp > Subject: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with > COMMENT) [snip] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I am out of my depth here… > > I noticed that rfc6685 Updated rfc5070, which this document Obsoletes. > rfc6685 just "specifies additional expert reviews for IODEF extensions". > But a similar consideration was not included in the bis. Is it not needed? Good point. This was an oversight. The expert review suggested by rfc6685 should be added to this draft too. > Should this document also Obsolete rfc6685? Yes, it should. Thanks for catching this issue! Roman
- Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Roman D. Danyliw
- Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Roman D. Danyliw