Re: Revision of RFC 1494 - Teletex mapping?

Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk> Tue, 10 January 1995 17:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06501; 10 Jan 95 12:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06497; 10 Jan 95 12:50 EST
Received: from survis.surfnet.nl by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10863; 10 Jan 95 12:50 EST
Received: from victor.nexor.co.uk by survis.surfnet.nl with SMTP (PP); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 18:06:23 +0100
Received: from nexor.co.uk (actually host tornado.nexor.co.uk) by victor.nexor.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 17:05:41 +0000
To: "Carl S. Gutekunst" <csg@hideji.worldtalk.com>
cc: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, mime-mhs@surfnet.nl
Subject: Re: Revision of RFC 1494 - Teletex mapping?
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 10 Jan 1995 08:33:10 -0800. <199501101633.IAA28353@hideji.worldtalk.com>
X-Phone: +44 115 952 0580
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 17:05:37 +0000
Message-ID: <25243.789757537@nexor.co.uk>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk>

Iso 6937 is deprecated in X.400(88) - there is no support for it as
an extended body part in the X.400 Message Store, so at least in
ISO/ITU the 6937 body part is on its way out.

Julian.