text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 and its downgrading

Vincent Roussillat <roussillat@transpac.atlas.fr> Wed, 10 May 1995 08:04 UTC

X400-Received: by /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:54:09 +0200
X400-Received: by mta xr1.atlas.fr in /PRMD=INTERNET/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:54:09 +0200
X400-Received: by /ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/; Relayed; Wed, 10 May 1995 09:54:07 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 09:54:07 +0200
X400-Originator: roussillat@transpac.atlas.fr
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/ADMD=ATLAS/C=FR/;XR1/10/05/610011]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: 8237 95/05/10
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Vincent Roussillat <roussillat@transpac.atlas.fr>
Message-ID: <"8237 95/05/10*/S=roussillat/O=transpac/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/"@MHS>
To: Non Receipt Notification Requested <mime-mhs@surfnet.nl>
Subject: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 and its downgrading

Sorry if my question has already been discussed on this list...
I would like to know what is the correct behaviour for an X400-SMTP 
gateway, when it receives a 'text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' and has to 
downgrade it to an X400-84 bodypart :
. rfc1494 tells to create an EBP General-Text and rfc1496 tells that such 
an EBP should be encapsulated in an IA5 bodypart, as it has been 
received, because General-Text EBP has no corresponding 84 Basic Form,
. but X419 tells that General-Text EBP downgrading should be done by 
creating an Undefined bodypart.
What is the right behaviour ?
----------------------------------------------
Vincent ROUSSILLAT     France Telecom Transpac
Phone +33 99.28.34.17      Fax +33 99.63.66.87
X.400   : s=roussillat;o=transpac;a=atlas;c=fr
Internet: vincent.roussillat@transpac.atlas.fr
See also: http://www.transpac.fr

text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 and its downgrading Vincent Roussillat