[Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3428)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 12 December 2012 12:30 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED4721F89F8 for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:30:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.559, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uDdmXEKzgnd for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985D021F89F7 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 71E51B1E002; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:22:18 -0800 (PST)
To: charliep@computer.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, henrik@levkowetz.com, mccap@petoni.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20121212122218.71E51B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:22:18 -0800
Cc: mip4@ietf.org, ville.nuorvala@birdstep.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3428)
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:30:59 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5944, "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5944&eid=3428 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Ville Nuorvala <ville.nuorvala@birdstep.com> Section: 3.3 Original Text ------------- M Minimal encapsulation. If the 'M' bit is set, the mobile node requests that its home agent use minimal encapsulation [16] for datagrams tunneled to the mobile node. Corrected Text -------------- M Minimal encapsulation. If the 'M' bit is set, the mobile node requests that its home agent use minimal encapsulation [15] for datagrams tunneled to the mobile node. Notes ----- The citation points to the wrong reference: [16] Plummer, D., "Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", STD 37, RFC 826, November 1982. It should point to: [15] Perkins, C., "Minimal Encapsulation within IP", RFC 2004, October 1996. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5944 (draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised Publication Date : November 2010 Author(s) : C. Perkins, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobility for IPv4 Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3428) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3… Henrik Levkowetz