Re: [Mip4] Does MIP support RegReq authentication without having to do timekeeping?

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985EB11E820F for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.332, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joevhJqYLw04 for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB28F11E81F4 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id r2EJeNjJ001390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:40:23 +0100
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2EJeNGm024648 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:40:23 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.86.3]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id r2EJeLPD020993 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:40:23 +0100
Message-ID: <51422787.5060509@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:39:51 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mip4@ietf.org
References: <514206FE.7050807@gmail.com> <3359F724933DFD458579D24EAC769098857A51DC@Redwood.usa.awardsolutions.com> <51421CB9.1080100@gmail.com> <CD85F32117029D4F9AEF48BDEF5536AB10215B92@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <514223C4.8010905@gmail.com> <CD85F32117029D4F9AEF48BDEF5536AB10215BCB@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <514226A9.9020700@gmail.com> <CD85F32117029D4F9AEF48BDEF5536AB10215C28@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD85F32117029D4F9AEF48BDEF5536AB10215C28@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Does MIP support RegReq authentication without having to do timekeeping?
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:40:25 -0000

Le 14/03/2013 20:38, Kent Leung (kleung) a écrit :
>
> It needs to have the time, even if it does second registration.
> It's not a problem it takes longer (we can send easily two messages).
> But the second message will also be refused by the HA because it
> still has the wrong time.
>
> KL> Why is the timestamp in the 2nd RRQ wrong?

Because the computer has lost its time, because it was turned off long
time (vehicle in garage for several weeks in winter time).  It now has
year 1970.

Alex

>
> Kent
>
>