[Mip4] Does that still make sense to save MIPv4 Address Space?

zhen <zhen@cs.dal.ca> Fri, 07 October 2005 21:20 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ENzds-0002Ih-Hs; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:20:36 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ENZwS-0004XZ-I1 for mip4@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:54:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18197 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.cs.dal.ca ([129.173.66.204]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ENa5Z-0002Xq-L3 for mip4@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:03:30 -0400
Received: from cs.dal.ca (peregrine.cs.Dal.Ca [129.173.66.213]) by mail.cs.dal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3816B109 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:53:56 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:53:16 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
From: zhen <zhen@cs.dal.ca>
To: mip4@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <200509301610.j8UGATQD030528@KIL-MX-2.UCIS.Dal.Ca>
Message-Id: <12A22BF1-3692-11DA-983A-0030654E24E8@cs.dal.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:20:35 -0400
Subject: [Mip4] Does that still make sense to save MIPv4 Address Space?
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip4-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip4-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, All,

Recently I found some idea about saving home address usage in MIPv4. 
Because each MN has to possess a public address, this is a huge 
consumption of IPv4 address space. Somebody told me it's no longer 
valid because people are soon using MIPv6 in wireless network. I'm not 
sure because in order to support IPv6, all hosts and routers must be 
updated. In my point of view, IPv4 will be still in use for quite a 
while. In wireless networking, such as 3G, within the network surely 
each terminal can use IPv6 address, but in order to communicate with 
IPv4 world, one IPv4 home address may still be necessary, so the waste 
of IPv4 address still exists.

looking forward to other opinions.

regards

Zhen


-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/