Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3438)
Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 02 January 2013 17:57 UTC
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7321F21F8716 for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:57:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0yfNE8-DO5Jf for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A88621F8713 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h25n7-s-oev-a31.ias.bredband.telia.com ([81.229.146.25]:60859 helo=vigonier.lan) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1TqSYg-00033J-7M; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:56:58 +0100
Message-ID: <50E474D3.4010301@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:56:35 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121115 Thunderbird/10.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
References: <20121227092922.5E302B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <50E461F3.9030309@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <50E461F3.9030309@innovationslab.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5E5397E0D84D02E80C328B9E"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.229.146.25
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: brian@innovationslab.net, charliep@computer.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, mccap@petoni.org, mip4@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: charliep@computer.org, mccap@petoni.org, mip4@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3438)
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:57:40 -0000
Hi Brian, On 2013-01-02 17:36 Brian Haberman said the following: > All, > This seems like a valid erratum to me and should be marked as > Verified? Agreed. Looks like a valid erratum to me. > Any objections? Best regards, Henrik > Regards, > Brian > > On 12/27/12 4:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5944, >> "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5944&eid=3438 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Pritish Aherrao <pritish_aherrao@yahoo.com> >> >> Section: 3.7.3.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> A Registration Reply that satisfies the validity checks of Section >> 3.8.2.1 is relayed to the mobile node. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> A Registration Reply that satisfies the validity checks of Section >> 3.7.3.1 is relayed to the mobile node. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Currently, the incorrect cross reference is provided. >> The Foreign Agent would perform the validity checks mentioned in Section 3.7.3.1 upon receiving the Registration Reply and would relay the Registration Reply that satisfies the validity checks. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5944 (draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-10) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised >> Publication Date : November 2010 >> Author(s) : C. Perkins, Ed. >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Mobility for IPv4 >> Area : Internet >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > >
- [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3438) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3… Brian Haberman
- Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (3… Charles E. Perkins