Subject: Re: [Mip6] comment on draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-00
From: Henrik Levkowetz <[email-masked]>
To: "Soliman, Hesham" <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], Alexandru Petrescu <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:23:55 +0200
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org

on 2005-10-28 20:16 Soliman, Hesham said the following:

>> > => No. Movement detection is done based on Router 
>> Discovery. That's 
>> > what MIPv4 assumes...It only extends RFC 1256. You don't need that 
>> > extension if you're not using MIPv4, you detect movement 
>> based on RFC
>> >  1256. That's something we can detail in the draft.
>> 
>> Ok, so DSMIPv6 would be extended with Router Discovery.
> 
> => No, router discovery is an IPv4 feature. DSMIPv6 could monitor
> changes in RAs to detect movement.

Right.

The most appropriate current reference for detecting changes in
attachment to IPv4 only networks would probably be the IPv4 DNA
document, currently draft-ietf-dhc-dna-ipv4-17.txt.

	Henrik

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6