[MLS] Extend interim tomorrow?
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 19 October 2020 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D713A03C9 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6DGMbPVLKmd for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E16E3A0365 for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id k9so7967774qki.6 for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zX85s1IU+71svBOYPRWGY9n54nRNUKZC08blLCO6BkQ=; b=pzZcUBw3hoK3mfn8nALVFv1l12yEmkh5JrxgGmI2RSW/wQqi0gWXzAuFMOy6BwR1uT Miq56vnaikr8Sd/HPOmdWU7dTIm6HZ6GGnkQrMkOAGijFMlxv+JFJ95hsU/0lvw6ttIf uMi04Im2JHGX/weLcFIr8Bm2jzN39IHk9+1vO73TabiRoo9WCu3gSRc73H2p6oUUGZhG bbKK+TEB7fMTKVfmUkM0fOz4jUC/eDui7AwC0mG/J1lraHWdmF/mmcVZzLvMA31v4te4 tOqLzemWYvvyWQ5m5ArHHD5Xj5apuwyF/mc1k6AY67MRoZVB/739xJmbwyxXwEdhLR4C AJQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zX85s1IU+71svBOYPRWGY9n54nRNUKZC08blLCO6BkQ=; b=RKCyiSxNBlxgzIWN7EHG6IFK5CzW/c12gjsJUW8nuA2KneRCsOh7enKPXZOMstWwvq lefjfwK1II8PR5D9lrgEf/Pinmzh4H4RBvnvt73KDkRj6hrJ7booyL7mOC3lb1AJC7b9 Tq2EkPAW8y2UPev1QRVewuR9Oq7XWU0Cq2Utz6kJgoTHvK2h40Ed+G4y5Dao65nDXKcc NXGTtgkK7K4/yi8BA8eub3XprS8ZY36TvA5L5ZXtimAR3Vw7e9GzafV+abdRTyQZwVmr 0Th/WCsMyVrPxYWqF90Px5pKNQcv6yycUjjWIPrwMaGiNoaeHvxyDV1U+zq0eSwDXnHa caTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SE5gzNFpb9lUMWqNayHTAD9xVLSOO/fgqtHDnQ/d0QHV2d/L7 DihkKFOs7R/kMBkoC1gY52Xyq6LelMAzuYfWZXvET8O5+Nw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydvB4yzbFO+Y8FvIh0/wloLsgDr8Kz9DnutlqHyCfJSnXAGGbpmqnI8GMQAs0MRYtLfvKf5OlpsmngRIUCbgc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:10b7:: with SMTP id h23mr16112137qkk.132.1603118708769; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:44:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgT=tigSUyuEcdJ5DOcG6x1YfQY5-+mmxvF1N7WcT2O4DQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b655805b2072994"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/6V1qj32aIAeqjjtmQbrKQkpvwMg>
Subject: [MLS] Extend interim tomorrow?
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:45:12 -0000
Hey all, We are getting so close to done! I think the current round of PRs is close to ready to merge, and once that's done, we'll be at the end of our technical issues and can issue draft-10. However, in order to support that, I think we might need a bit more than the 60 minutes of interim time that is scheduled for tomorrow. Would folks be available to add another 30-60min on after that if we need it? Chairs, I'll let you opine on how this squares with IETF rules. Cheers, --Richard
- [MLS] Extend interim tomorrow? Richard Barnes
- Re: [MLS] Extend interim tomorrow? Raphael Robert
- Re: [MLS] Extend interim tomorrow? Sean Turner