[MLS] Re: New drafts

[Rohan Mahy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Konrad,
Thanks for the quick summary. I'm just recovering from the draft deadline,
so I haven't had a chance to look at any of these yet, but I am very keen
on virtual clients/subtrees. I'll have a look at the other three drafts and
give feedback over the next week and a half.
Thanks,
-rohan

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:21 PM Konrad Kohbrok <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We uploaded a few new drafts for discussion at the upcoming IETF 124.
> Here’s the TL;DR on each of them.
>
> - Single Signature KeyPackage: KeyPackages with only one signature. If the
> group is interested, we could try something similar for commits.
>
> - DMLS/Fork Resilient MLS: I’ve cut the draft to its essence. If people
> are interested in the general approach, I’d like to know what is needed to
> push this towards adoption.
>
> - Virtual clients: We added a bunch of concrete protocol details, although
> a few gaps remain. Notably, we have moved away from the challenge based
> application message approach to the one proposed by Brendan [1].
>
> - LeafOperationIntents: I applied the suggestions by Samir, removed the
> update functionality and included the ability to remove multiple clients at
> once. Again, I’d like to know if there is enough interest for me to
> continue working on this.
>
> Cheers,
> Konrad
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>