[MLS] Comments on open PRs

Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6023A041D for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id neVodv5rqjQs for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC313A0414 for <mls@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id z3so302439vka.10 for <mls@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gbEOCozF7qzlBxHexS8z5tbguDgAFWqANkCO5kFEmPw=; b=dHNDtQIHw+apsnwbiG/Xr4W5NwjiNog3Su0PYDafpQbO4T1DIBW9kYHwNHXRCqrRFX xTaB9fE6nEVmspzSCAcZQueZZZXloPkxms4MxYy1p+LPsaJ7PaEnqAXU+f4KBee4LrGx oCRUkhvtT+8VRqtKRO++tYF949sqETBcS0paY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gbEOCozF7qzlBxHexS8z5tbguDgAFWqANkCO5kFEmPw=; b=Qj/cVQUsIgoB29UmA7PCnrB2WVMBFKsARJ6jX7cF53Egn1FVlwW96BM/ZRDQH0Fcg/ YE0RNDOOAoMtKSbzqgTfurR3UDfJoXdVl0eZjQ1jAJ4f9vGnLfE7pqawSB1TCO9AKUsk YsTYRzsKfSQthdbYfnCUYUOHSN35b1RZ7liePKYHueoAFitanaMkBVybrVpMu5VdH8IR iTYiHj6ywecORpf1QULTcAogNKd2+77uJYyI6tHHsLzdxyg9hwNUbAOIiiaNJh1kbkQH D6dxslODgxUqcd7+U9d6wYAjn3uNj+fLXyEkTwYR6Eoh6Wu1z8ZFaY6aI2Zb5gjV6gJ3 5Cdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zbaL2G/QXYbL+15oWMG9D+TQRKtVAoEPLP0g/jVAp2aYBs6hx a74zqwbIUYrgRnkK7D0Y0hcwlHJ0Mpjse9bVPvSjrgI6pcC/BA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBavrBDCutUtBgwS/tLNTOL77mCVacxE1y41nCV2EZtJewtv/Bt//P8rnSJCpHedK7ok2/1Rmx/Cae8twdMb8=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:ac8e:: with SMTP id v136mr4370846vke.40.1590719767662; Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 19:35:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFDDyk_Vv-SSSCc1baPG_27FT0oUq7P94UTEVQtzihNcFtRjNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b0923405a6c04e50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/9fyQafBMZnk2u_CGgxZbViOhjY0>
Subject: [MLS] Comments on open PRs
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 02:36:11 -0000

MLSWG,

There are several open pull requests on the protocol document:
https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol/pulls

We discussed three PRs during the last meeting:
PR #336 PSK Injection
PR #331 Making ratcheting optional for Adds
PR #337 n-PRF (multi-PSK injection)

The discussion of #331 was not completely captured in the draft meeting
notes, so if someone has something to add, please comment on this PR:
https://github.com/mlswg/wg-materials/pull/9

If you'd like to advocate for or against any of these changes, either reply
on this thread or start a new thread on the mailing list. We'll discuss the
changes at the next interim meeting (next Tuesday).

Nick & Sean