Re: [MLS] TreeKEM: An alternative to ART

Benjamin Beurdouche <benjamin.beurdouche@inria.fr> Thu, 10 May 2018 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <benjamin.beurdouche@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6E71250B8 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 16:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uWuqNGLbdnRp for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 16:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC8912E056 for <mls@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2018 16:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,387,1520895600"; d="scan'208";a="326440793"
Received: from lfbn-idf3-1-265-205.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO [192.168.1.12]) ([83.199.136.205]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2018 01:52:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Benjamin Beurdouche <benjamin.beurdouche@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15E302)
In-Reply-To: <20180510232511.GD84491@kduck.kaduk.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 01:52:04 +0200
Cc: Alexey Ermishkin <scratch@virgilsecurity.com>, mls@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A46EBAA4-1E5A-436D-902D-54D7AF4FE26F@inria.fr>
References: <CABcZeBOGJTYTGqYLhqafM=yE9hCZP06KbjKfBqMVTr=yoUYUrw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTTe=8mw3q7FXNLWD7pe=XTuKj3P3C1=-GXHZSFQybzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRn6wHMDoCL+UCaHtD8GV30=+aSrvCY+Jf64tKtqkfV2Q@mail.gmail.com> <1525379746.825004.1360053824.4E4ADFCA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <88F8850B-8321-49A2-844F-5685FBBCB817@gmail.com> <CABdrxL6RnM29wnK+_CaHtuwBH3dB0R+8b9vMHLKfqLZT-90HQA@mail.gmail.com> <5C6CD0C4-8982-450E-BBA1-E276CD673345@gmail.com> <000601d3e7c4$e1662390$a4326ab0$@virgilsecurity.com> <20180510232511.GD84491@kduck.kaduk.org>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/WL_0pi8mpf3dfW_KQw3Mn86m1RM>
Subject: Re: [MLS] TreeKEM: An alternative to ART
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 23:52:10 -0000

> Perhaps.  I'll note that I did raise IoT at the BoF, and the sense
> of the room seemed to be that it was out of scope.  That said, the
> draft charter should be going out for community review real soon
> now, and we can certainly have a discussion then.

I don’t think so, my feeling was that the room didn’t want to make the center of the work, but I do think that MLS is useful and might be used for IoT.

We definitely are and, in the future, should be keeping in mind constraint environments when designing MLS even though it is not the top priority...

B.

>> So, my question is, in terms of resources, what would be the better choice for such medium sized but low on CPU and RAM groups? Is it ART or TreeKEM? 
> 
> (The above should not be construed as a request to not explore the
> answers to these questions.)
> 
> -Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list
> MLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls