[MLS] Some data

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 15 October 2019 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74074120879 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yxul4xpPL8H4 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A0CD120815 for <mls@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id o44so17355545ota.10 for <mls@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yt9NnXd986D+I6nQr8JbhlQwPWpWj7Oz7tJSaVKONlw=; b=e3do2pYTV+4GSLNFtIsxL26DPzmEs4Pz1jt76UAdXlLisTPSUvA9gXCqTzuMIIxbIA X78Pud7VMl6V3TkIfeH0+rwtF1v5c4kaADIIKDV01YcV4x3GrkTh0cxa2XhYnHTcFfTr mR+x+BkD7tw/zOq/Y2ADJyzlv5uLTTL6KpzWZIz6b+hMzfp5eFtf/52w3RcnSuCjaGrp Ft0O7eaVe+CCPr3jPFL3CGO0MdSr0hfQ0Y2c1ke4vmOQBwVZyHAwSxfe0zulJwF0Lf2V mhnvXe08Vnt9CJJgrStG+C13kRHyZ3P3iWbDkKvJuorfBy2Ctv4hLP92n93WUWbCu9Kk ilYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yt9NnXd986D+I6nQr8JbhlQwPWpWj7Oz7tJSaVKONlw=; b=hyYx+dPcrZQyzRoHmeVzVE4lMQOahEyAE1sCqLxll8/4QCwe4NW9VpYamo/56rl5yj 5UVHBnh5ya0w/RR76LLnpkmps48Kgi9iIy97xhKme48rJYf23cixxGRCZXfBxorjiP2y e+nR/4b5aM1GRkJFHZ1SQdxM+NY4rij8dDpPdzx4tfpL6HSf67g4E1vax574+Paba1kT R0Zb+jICUPkTqiY1BqLZvXnm1CWPvOiYa2BXIH4KuhCf3tWcP39HYQqTYHJY/BAIwApF oEZKVLwJfZEzqHszViNyz3uG7ZL8gKlZIenDYUdz+YIXv8iBp619AsqyZmKs/qVljIfu Hz2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXP+X5IjpP/8MGNaGvc/gFA8gHSvWwVjFx1smTAyojsbBnHVC5x slV+iyuJbfT66bXVvPtx2x1n8jo6Ll7c4oJfzgJwULWa
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyC8oz7HOCTc0yFiHSSoKrBRbEL0tKshM5X5ANtiIYlb+OJ0TunQvZ182pQvipZ7e82c1lmM2f7AlNmO/G2hQo=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:550a:: with SMTP id l10mr432964oth.93.1571155023287; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:56:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTe3SgDQgW3--4A3nUm=+mZrd_NyMfkfhi0Qs6KHayH+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000ceb7c0594f50955"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/cX2SZVHphamTjvLvqG8ReM2nhJU>
Subject: [MLS] Some data
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:57:11 -0000

Hey all,

I've managed to extract histories for a collection of Webex Teams groups, a
total of 950 groups (including 1-1 conversations) ranging in size from 2 to
5000 members.

What data would people be interested in understanding from this data set?

I'm currently working on extracting "transcripts" of
init/add/remove/message events, with the idea that they could be fed into a
simulator attached to some library to generate counts of actual crypto
operations.  But it would also be easy to extract summary statistics, such
as the inter-arrival rates for Adds / Removes, Add:Remove ratios, etc.

One caveat is that Webex Teams allows self-add and self-remove, in addition
to adds/removes initiated by someone in the group.  Self-adds account for
~6% of all adds, but self-removes (leaves) are 98% of all removes.  The
latter might be an artifact of "server-initiated" removes being reflected
as self-removes, but of course server-initiated removes have similar issues
w.r.t. MLS.

--Richard