Return-Path: X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044A913117B for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.988 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpfzzahrRTcG for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DFB130F1C for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y9-v6so2487031vky.3 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o2V8YP6/dSgieUUqfhkaMdFYKz1mT6bkT7MtB0+qLYE=; b=lWngzFBjczUIpcVjHH/n63VKguNvJYPs3CTA+bFlJ8W3O1XHjAWPo7oanOgl9oFx44 dwiceAuoJd+POuIrBs5EwlvjWvXCavj9MNEACkRGoFpNq8eXRQZw8B12YKEobrrjbXd+ trYfWhUMYSavZ2BVfgzmcKk+/yMNVpgg0lX/h0utJU44n/3wU9HKB0SfBZ2yUCUMsvaN sXShaFQGyULZFDNMVkzVU88M5ITBpmg0MOlKBYgMePxwNJ0RaV15sJgK4MNNLjQadMbL yxt1+a4qd6nXMD3I/MgiPN9l6ym9h4uFqd88qreVc/Ri8caxrsFiip0+hVnrJS3yDic2 Uodw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o2V8YP6/dSgieUUqfhkaMdFYKz1mT6bkT7MtB0+qLYE=; b=mwWeQpKdUX9oQt+mRjm4L4j6DO5RZHpFpBIb/TVZlkAVka14RNC5Xzh97JWj8jH+7Q Q7yj+VzWuR1xhXawDtpT5WU6TKzUk11AUsSQQpGOZJ1Jm2nYC9WL2BN1zDJAJNLpSYeA 6NRwaVQ43ECqi2qjbHlhieFM+XaHGvFw2nfa2y2kGC5u81b1BcbqRu56vag/dDhgBbx1 3qjiwBq5ls5LyEWU353gSQB+Qcx37yYceRzfajDxPKsb/5bYtj9mpRFIiipv1PoZ1JJN AneYtQqp8Ut8CAWYzYgtUbzu5IeL6280BsyyYKZpGLKWqDZPBs4XKU0aH4B01Hrswm6D iXIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlET4rhePuXZXfs0sWUbRCKmdP7WsTNcu91JGXGP06jFcVCPGBoB hQWPgAwCuEH18snxXPdo/nhjraoFugEtaUCRhSc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpds2iQkD+y8Pk/fR55C9OI2aDCt+vDqMIw/I/gqBSTqICmQzzegRFuicASYQyBmOTqAcT8efrZIcj5oVDkzeXo= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3653:: with SMTP id d80-v6mr11035641vka.79.1532455012897; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Suhas Nandakumar Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:56:42 -0700 Message-ID: To: Benjamin Beurdouche Cc: ML Messaging Layer Security , Nick Sullivan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad972f0571c27c58" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [MLS] Call for adoption: draft-barnes-mls-protocol X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Messaging Layer Security List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:56:58 -0000 --000000000000ad972f0571c27c58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support the adoption On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM Benjamin Beurdouche < benjamin.beurdouche@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi all, > > I agree with this draft becoming a WG document. > > Best, > Benjamin > > On Jul 24, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Nick Sullivan < > nick=3D40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > All, > > The sense of the MLS@IETF102 room was the WG should adopt > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-mls-protocol/ as a WG item. > We have marked the draft as a "Candidate for WG Adoption=E2=80=9D in the > datatracker, but now it=E2=80=99s time to officially do the WG call for a= doption. > So, if you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are > willing to review various versions as it moves through the process, then > please let the list know by 2359UTC 2018.08.03. If you are opposed to thi= s > being a WG document, please say so (and say why). > > Cheers, > > Nick and Sean > > _______________________________________________ > MLS mailing list > MLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls > > > _______________________________________________ > MLS mailing list > MLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls > --000000000000ad972f0571c27c58 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I support the adoption=C2=A0

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM Benjamin Beurdouche <= benjamin.beurdouche@inria.f= r> wrote:
Hi all,

<= /div>I agree with this draft becoming a WG document.

Bes= t,
Benjamin

On Jul 24, 2= 018, at 10:44 AM, Nick Sullivan <nick=3D40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org= > wrote:

All,

The sense of the MLS@IETF102 room was=C2=A0the WG= =C2=A0should adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/dr= aft-barnes-mls-protocol/ as a WG item. We have marked the draft = as a "Candidate for WG Adoption=E2=80=9D in the=C2=A0datatr= acker, but now it=E2=80=99s time to officially do the WG call for ad= option. So, if you would like for this draft to become a WG document and yo= u are willing to review various versions as it moves through the process, t= hen please let the list know by 2359UTC 2018.08.03. If you are opposed to t= his being a WG document, please say so (and say why).
=
Cheers,

Nick and Sean

_______________________________________________
MLS mailing list
MLS@ietf.org
https://ww= w.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls

_= ______________________________________________
MLS mailing list
MLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls
--000000000000ad972f0571c27c58--