[MLS] Re: Working Last Call: draft-ietf-mls-architecture (more) PRs

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

Brendan & Benjamin,

Thoughts on whether you prefer 314 or 274?

spt

> On Mar 7, 2025, at 4:16 AM, Théophile Wallez <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I have written an alternative PR for "Add recommendation about KeyPackage expiration" (last one I promise)
> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/314
> 
> The first PR initially contained some text about KeyPackage expiration which ended up being removed because it was redundant with other text in RFC 9420. This alternative PR includes some text about KeyPackage expiration again, but better written and in a better place in the document (I hope).
> 
> Cheers,
> Théophile.
> 
> On 05/03/2025 17:40, Sean Turner wrote:
>> Hi! This message starts a working group last call for two more “late stage” PRs against draft-ietf-mls-architecture [0] that follow:
>> 
>> Add recommendation about KeyPackage expiration:
>> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/274
>> 
>> Cite a new analysis of TreeKEM:
>> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/313
>> 
>> Please send a message to the list indicating whether you support merging these PRs by 2359 UTC on 12 March 2025. If you do not agree with merging these PRs, please indicate why either here or in the PRs.
>> 
>> NOTE: The draft-ietf-mls-architecture is in AUTH48, i.e., just about the be published by the RFC editor. To make these changes at this “late stage”, we need positive acknowledgment that the WG is a-okay with these changes at this late date.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nick & Sean
>> 
>> [0] PR#273 is also in the repo, but that incorporates copy edits as suggested by the RFC editor as part of AUTH48 processing.
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]