[MLS] [ratchet tree update example]

Pascal Junod <pascalj@snap.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <pjunod@snapchat.com>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C558120052 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 04:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=snap.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 919tT4xbHgJZ for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE73512006E for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id q1so27637575ion.1 for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=snap.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YvrGd0rOZPCWWNmD10/7KupMuLD3Pt+S9icCGz93e7Q=; b=UnX20iDYuEFcI3OxzuzAYLOYVFVUrnCuUOGHwQ28+KAkEIjg3TzD0J988BumJqOVTH sJRKMzM1Qg2HAmNZwiahrcWaiwxrv9NYNDKuY3jisN4gY8ovAf3sAFk2IayAZQ5FFlof DGjzi9twlc377pQ0RcmocPn7xTxfJQJg79QIs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YvrGd0rOZPCWWNmD10/7KupMuLD3Pt+S9icCGz93e7Q=; b=uAs5qaziGUuMCO9GDzGy+X6gLbqYFn/kIWGq8ACp2HzqRaY7FiMhunsxkUOkRrhKTd 3a7Pp9c0oExrOmdbQlS95eFzpTvvmRFB+CoUxhcLmd4aeFvnJP48Dhjix0dJMvDvdW9u Z7huGIllttlCUhH1wlmZ3SbQKqQ/D5pRznnES7U2N6AUsN5ocnrGKdlXq7AyasCdovjU VBpu8g7ybtePqvMfCW49SEiwDCJnr9NehFVIFlbBU5EX52DxPqMqVC1LnAiJyEfhZLBc FQUHky+QZg3f8JmQUJRGxM2X2JD8vqCn4gqACvHKOp891lVZfpB9vCfLekf3KKXWdpWg wUhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVp6SOGZRWfbFvfj5GpOt8ZsI1aM6BmFRxunR4PuWak1qLdnrqq s5SO5ap065YYtFKz+wrWOVXx4qConJEtmLpodkkD0hEYoeY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvtCQK0XYsG9ZL83T44Krl0wvTwHb1GhUyWLfmKacVliOIBdrT9XkJ6dpo7dqQ+70MKGSzalsyjgWdPXjpcUI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b213:: with SMTP id b19mr22440483iof.58.1570446565689; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Pascal Junod <pascalj@snap.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:09:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPOUjt5LCmpR1YzgvE6a4-yNY9c+_YktC=m6D3vmVT-RYdD-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b001910594501541"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/lQ_mOxogf1bvmel-rEsa1hDFJjw>
Subject: [MLS] [ratchet tree update example]
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:09:27 -0000

Hello,

I have a quick question about the example discussed through the "Ratchet
Tree Updates" and "Synchronizing Views of the Tree" sections.

Currently, an encryption of ps[2] under public keys of nodes C and D is
described. In my opinion, it should be a single ciphertext encrypted with
public key F, whose corresponding private key is known by both C and D. Or
did I misunderstood something?

Best,

Pascal