Re: [MLS] Planning: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting

Sean Turner <> Thu, 02 April 2020 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B9E3A077C for <>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fECp9MCyz6k for <>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 840FB3A0766 for <>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id z13so2272436qvw.3 for <>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=7hX41YiZXa3j0k6MKfkHE6w1ZydKDlN4u1vRFupRjB8=; b=fQUVUv6kNkPwL4VeNz1nB2mpNnBdepE0UdsmdTDXPnvgxUzkqWWn/iqGaSJZjm0s+n umaGeP6XZ8eLUP/h57lpJAeQSW+wVGHztMrxeb9meq6KhCaK63LbB+hixc9QcBp/c7qe Om7YtohU6HaGejNZefXjBwDbpn/U8QyoaZgfo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=7hX41YiZXa3j0k6MKfkHE6w1ZydKDlN4u1vRFupRjB8=; b=IWl4THyjIi8wQ/9Ohhn4UrKJgNdVDO68xkJLbPCSEHc55jb1gEKa+dCYo3UAlca48d PZQxYHVRozSrfEZ/GoGfBMuWl0pl+/zNJd/AzJbGYO2FLFk8ypQs8ka3etbl+Y/vOvK8 ogfjXoyJeB+NsAw63PovFYgpcEZ2iuL8nMOMMK3q9smZ1tqpNLWTLSo6SqPq6w+wnFGi lwsvYKi6hvfKFhuq79/dlpuSI4Iz7Df7XZ0Axz//fFCkLpM738sldFwdr5LQdchjhS79 yydJMBGUpKYBahVqzoLUeiH/o1WftCH6KmVwIdx0fXFxjQBa9K29MrjbBtNFdmyF1icK RAfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYDwMsAQrh1twWW0Us1wTI4wkxb239xLK0/HjFIu9fwpjc6vab0 Bz1nB9zgAkeVxIrzz0Ay6IAKaW5H54w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLTT21AbbfM+Qa8COFCPK71FJubLskQU7eT3+CqLRKUcP6qAQkpxDIDiwsyw92FpLNJcF4lHw==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c2d0:: with SMTP id c16mr4775808qvi.118.1585852935939; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sn3rd.lan ([]) by with ESMTPSA id a136sm4167301qkb.15.2020. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:42:14 -0400
References: <>
To: MLS List <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [MLS] Planning: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:42:19 -0000

hi MLS,

There were enough people that could not make the 31st that we decided to try for another day. We have looked at the scheduled virtual interims ( in the coming weeks and have decided that either the 16th or the 21st could work both in terms of getting the formal approvals (we need a week) as well as making sure we do not have major clashes (we want to make sure participants can attend). This virtual would be 1.5 hours long.

We also want to determine how often we should meet after that. The two choices that seem reasonable are weekly and bi-weekly.

Finally, we need pick a time. There are four main clusters of participants are in the following timezones EDT, PDT, CEST, and BST. With the four time zones there really is no good time:
Since the other virtual interims were scheduled for 0600am PST, we ought to give them a break and not have it so early. So, I’ve proposed four times later in the day.

Please fill out the doodle poll to let us know what works:


> On Mar 19, 2020, at 14:34, Nick Sullivan <> wrote:
> Hello MLSWG members,
> Since the IETF 107 is no longer happening in person, it may be useful to have a virtual meeting for MLS instead. There are a number of PRs and ideas to discuss.
> Please fill out the following poll to help us determine interest:
> Nick & Sean
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list