[MLS] Re: Working Last Call: draft-ietf-mls-architecture (more) PRs

Brendan McMillion <brendanmcmillion@gmail.com> Tue, 11 March 2025 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brendanmcmillion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080CD9D3603 for <mls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaVdhgHw4tjK for <mls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0093C9D35FC for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-86d30787263so2225278241.1 for <mls@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741666526; x=1742271326; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d/VjkyNAbrlcIA2ig9B5JuMYsm/3+g1aHM8XyPX+1SI=; b=g6CnpoEc3Cwmfci016FqCb4ZHLh+oazAIhJm5CJBy0AL7PsP5IkWggI+QNeEpDPagj GNHU0SRUmpCGo0Nzr8MrJ2c2o+KzDipfQCZ9gxAaBd6fY3MxMMIi4jdbiwgVS2UePJ55 R/tAJeMKggP7wMpqjFyIcCESa+0rb1RmmL31vXrZfj69EMjelv6Fwlr1JT72U7RHVfbA KHvaA0CD0rTnKQg/+bzl0QoBvdnrwG6aBnnjn5Knu5yhPlYBvvrZCtGKOqpJVPfK43uP L4sde2hUJFrtDXp1ysCUx5EGEKOKNO5PloH0j+Py770b73JAHVEtCq1iQomFX1fSla5b bBZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741666526; x=1742271326; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=d/VjkyNAbrlcIA2ig9B5JuMYsm/3+g1aHM8XyPX+1SI=; b=qoUEn+jKuqsLEWOVjJBy0jQM6lYZQNFFBTQGKdIGZoZTK9v4Lc2vujXEbK8wrxHQ7K jlnjh4g1WXZHbujymiG8TqwkglftuBMJav2MsKmOJTnMb2jnH+R+8G7dgSXrZzRHyTYG Ga7RfbyDoeVUWTrN51iVSv00+4V8+Wp64hkPDS5FI5I8U2J8HINF+oBOfMCKqDnRNApq JmS3RVXwICWNHJn6BLim8fjWDs36HfU4NjZOm3D0YnVBiDl8OXOPYkeM5hkT5AZeCOSU iM9eiqhQnWhyVd473mXnVJRGa/7x62ib1gwxz/etTtxJk+K0fI+lbkhiWA8x0GU0xzVf 2utg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy76nGLSkG0OjYuDUaxuHBhpR+Ypg5ez0NHnZOAHVe3Mr6X7mLt Vv0EV8aVwstkYyldqPWmzNUhrMCmsB1cKxITdbRReN3dtt3shRwDVW7jmkwwCLQfviKKId0uAln 7yx4oY/rBwF+Aq6MKGLryl32RsjPdwg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvvPJSjT9U04DGUaDdUZPHVgOE66EEjdutP4UIHxWPuO0oF0BOQmu8XqlkMIjz bPG56FrwuztnLoxJO15oETEatNwMnBQvUZgiIzgF8S6yMlYjb4rpR5buR3WiGPPoPmDw18iZBR0 XcX2fn8ddvZqYybBpOQGckgiavlzYbMo4kPxc34APNnJTLs+rTnZ6cuYiA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFCV6wC/tw9BGxD2734DgB0dHbEJm9Y+ZtsRdz0LpJnzvYsCeKCixr0VWAZdw54SO4AQ8ZCFtTkY7MAR5VOnIk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2b96:b0:4c1:7d0d:a48c with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-4c30a730fa8mr10829221137.22.1741666526232; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <90A4CFCE-68C1-4BF7-BECA-D36B1434FBC0@sn3rd.com> <7e4ec017-0089-41a7-a2a7-c06c768aa0e2@inria.fr> <1227A3FC-386B-4290-91F6-17455DCF21DC@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1227A3FC-386B-4290-91F6-17455DCF21DC@sn3rd.com>
From: Brendan McMillion <brendanmcmillion@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:15:15 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JqpvmW3ZKv7jCZD2Ay2JUuoEV6Hjhc8zq42Z3jJ_Y42y-ZoY5XarJHtA-o
Message-ID: <CAJTd26LSyAduAYck_sBG861v+co-Tmwhgeu_yO6aedQ3tkg4Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d08890630095677"
Message-ID-Hash: TTCD5YQ5KQYVM7R6JPXGIU7Q4254BEHB
X-Message-ID-Hash: TTCD5YQ5KQYVM7R6JPXGIU7Q4254BEHB
X-MailFrom: brendanmcmillion@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: MLS List <mls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [MLS] Re: Working Last Call: draft-ietf-mls-architecture (more) PRs
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/zJVNTsnBwLSkb2tsxx5LM5zu05Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mls-leave@ietf.org>

I would still prefer 274. The new text in 314 is not quite right and I
don't see a reason to block publication on litigating it.

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:57 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> Brendan & Benjamin,
>
> Thoughts on whether you prefer 314 or 274?
>
> spt
>
> > On Mar 7, 2025, at 4:16 AM, Théophile Wallez <theophile.wallez@inria.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > I have written an alternative PR for "Add recommendation about
> KeyPackage expiration" (last one I promise)
> > https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/314
> >
> > The first PR initially contained some text about KeyPackage expiration
> which ended up being removed because it was redundant with other text in
> RFC 9420. This alternative PR includes some text about KeyPackage
> expiration again, but better written and in a better place in the document
> (I hope).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Théophile.
> >
> > On 05/03/2025 17:40, Sean Turner wrote:
> >> Hi! This message starts a working group last call for two more “late
> stage” PRs against draft-ietf-mls-architecture [0] that follow:
> >>
> >> Add recommendation about KeyPackage expiration:
> >> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/274
> >>
> >> Cite a new analysis of TreeKEM:
> >> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/313
> >>
> >> Please send a message to the list indicating whether you support
> merging these PRs by 2359 UTC on 12 March 2025. If you do not agree with
> merging these PRs, please indicate why either here or in the PRs.
> >>
> >> NOTE: The draft-ietf-mls-architecture is in AUTH48, i.e., just about
> the be published by the RFC editor. To make these changes at this “late
> stage”, we need positive acknowledgment that the WG is a-okay with these
> changes at this late date.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nick & Sean
> >>
> >> [0] PR#273 is also in the repo, but that incorporates copy edits as
> suggested by the RFC editor as part of AUTH48 processing.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MLS mailing list -- mls@ietf.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to mls-leave@ietf.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLS mailing list -- mls@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to mls-leave@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list -- mls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mls-leave@ietf.org
>