Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario

Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com> Fri, 13 March 2009 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1103A6AF9; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wprdYZKLiPpn; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822163A65A5; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so1743782rvb.49 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TqRtMlzWvrucZSGfYM3qDMYZW8SeWETDsEJmJ6EFYJg=; b=JgqkWDmP9/FikZHqYhYHK8ZMPkd3sJ9cU+raeYClf28rUzjJjeumfHMshkC1VYN7ZW V4zIgunL0i6kAfn9oWBbbdDwoAE5j47xYRBanDDzQzPO8/IelSVJ18ZZ3EsQu90uqjjg PFUmxNmAH40m1aFBh91pInT79mFG88m5mf2FM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ut7+9xSSDCrbdjLlyBXhJlbpm34qTbdnoE25uBguz4OyXdkNSrBgdp4W5NbfaefmnN iCFg2ZGsVtXYdGqEeNbmlCeuoh7JSNwKTc0hh/2nqEX/IwHafZtqntf1fWCPiQ+aWJJh KTlFiac8FogaXVetGCUxL2tvXILEsYT0YBdvU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.102.1 with SMTP id z1mr1088925wab.186.1236970020193; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF692BD006.7F5E1FD0-ON85257578.006671FE-85257578.00669D61@us.ibm.com>
References: <f0b9e3410903131119w11a4d8a0ha91c00ece76ebb01@mail.gmail.com> <OF692BD006.7F5E1FD0-ON85257578.006671FE-85257578.00669D61@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:47:00 -0800
Message-ID: <f0b9e3410903131147p2469faf3k9b39a897acf0bb06@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
To: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636458d88a6c819046504866b"
Cc: mmox-bounces@ietf.org, MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:46:26 -0000

Thats great. I think we need all the running implementations we can get. To
me, actually using an implementation is very meaningful.

The other thing that I think this group is going to be concerned with is
describing a set of 'well-known" ports for clients and servers.

One of the things I notice is a significant problem in folks getting clients
and servers setup with various firewalls and as I understand it, the IETF is
concerned with making recommendations for "well-known" ports. This very well
may mean a change in some or all of the virtual worlds as we move forward in
defining a common set of ports for this work.

Charles Krinke
OpenSim Core Developer
OSGrid Director


On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM, David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> I'm also in the process of shaking out the bugs in a OGP complient AD for
> the OpenSim codebase. (built as an opensim servcie, cloned off of the user
> service) This will give us a second complete example of the design as well
> as a place to experiment with variations.
>
> - David W. Levine
> ~ Zha Ewry (ISL)
>
>
>
>  *Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com>*
> Sent by: mmox-bounces@ietf.org
>
> 03/13/2009 02:19 PM
>   To
> "Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com>
>  cc
> MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
>  Subject
> Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
>
>
>
>
> Thank you for correcting my mis-perception, Meadhbh (Infinity) that OGP is
> alive and well on the Linden end. I would urge folks to use it and test its
> capabilities and limits on an ongoing basis.
>
> Any implementations that are being used helps gain momentum and confidence
> in any implemented solution for interop so all of this is to our mutual
> advantage.
>
> Charles Krinke
> OpenSim Core Developer
> OSGrid Director
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity) <*
> infinity@lindenlab.com* <infinity@lindenlab.com>> wrote:
> which is to say... we're not adding new features to the OGP test grid, and
> probably won't 'til we more fully specify them and get feedback from our
> beta testers.
>
> during the course of last summer's beta, we learned a lot and received a
> fair amount of community input. submitting OGP to the IETF standardization
> process is part of the process of continuing OGP development. in short... we
> think the protocol for auth, teleport and event queue are fully baked.
> but... we want to get more input from the community ( especially from people
> who participate in last summer's beta and IETF "regulars" who may have more
> experience wedging things like OAuth / OpenID into existing protocols. ) and
> we want this process to take place in an IETF managed venue. and we're
> thinking that before we assign resources to add new features to the OGP test
> grid, we want to have a better idea of the end definition of these services.
>
> to recap... we want to get another round of commentary on the existing OGP
> drafts before adding new bits of code to the grid and to the viewer. and we
> want to have enough time for everyone (OpenSim, PyOGP, viewer developers,
> etc.) to receive and integrate new protocol definitions.
>
> -cheers
> -meadhbh
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Bill Humphries wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Charles Krinke wrote:
>
> I have seen OGP work. I have also heard from a couple of folks that LL has
> stopped the test with the betagrid. If this is not true, please correct me.
> If it is true, may I suggest it might be to LL's advantage to start it up
> again and let folks use it.
>
> Charles,
>
> Linden Lab has been keeping the OGP agent server and regions up, but not
> doing active development.
>
> ---
> Whump Linden is Bill Humphries || *whump@lindenlab.com*<whump@lindenlab.com>||
> *http://secondlife.com/* <http://secondlife.com/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list*
> **mmox@ietf.org* <mmox@ietf.org>*
> **https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox*<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list*
> **mmox@ietf.org* <mmox@ietf.org>*
> **https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox*<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Krinke
> OpenSim Core Developer
> OSGrid Director_______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list
> mmox@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>
>


-- 
Charles Krinke
OpenSim Core Developer
OSGrid Director