Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Generic Client model
Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com> Sun, 15 March 2009 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB63F3A6AAE for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+3Mt0rbpPA4 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9073A6915 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1215673wag.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i8etSYGff+H/N11cHusU9D0lByGBVxirOYeHZjkJcjw=; b=WumdScNlCY1kAgT7azOFxHrBa4fFechUAfRSitm2yNIMvE2hbx8i4kvC7LUFbR3GWz YlSiTpML1XcTOrvZBzwekcLTUHK8irtwnCq17epkg2o8tw/Vv/TPRmZWpaBoCCsKyszH KrN2BTPOjfOo87eDUiDg/RdlPMcCgSvoQG8QA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XKwnvehkhNmZmK+nAPVTlYvM55ZZSgUH9qknejQpQMr8X8ddj62pGNoOXTcwx7QSfA lt3bZvSoeTbSOpVlP4/9Ub0bLdVkoQ62vwvHWtLNEI3y0IV5E32S2Vo0G8VIOTEHJkim uo+goPVTSpZ88NvNw2Icxau0lBbL23YIGl9Sc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.144.1 with SMTP id r1mr2064296wad.2.1237078606822; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49BC08DC.2010503@gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0903120735s5311a922ybbc40a30433166a3@mail.gmail.com> <49B934B9.3080408@gmail.com> <49B940DF.8040009@lindenlab.com> <e0b04bba0903130451v2d33f9ebxfa3b337513bf286c@mail.gmail.com> <49BB0C46.8070809@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903140305ocdbef86kcec140371dabf00b@mail.gmail.com> <49BC08DC.2010503@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:56:46 -0800
Message-ID: <f0b9e3410903141756p2d4d7324y3fa0283d87367029@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
To: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636418009eb3dae04651dce84"
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Generic Client model
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:56:07 -0000
As long as this group adopts ports and protocols that do not preclude OGP, HyperGrid, MXP or other, I see no reason why LESS could not become viable. As we know, it will be the users of our virtual worlds technologies that will ultimately determine the viability (or lack thereof) of interoperability. It seems to me that concentrating on a flexible enough protocol to allow all the ideas described (and more) to bloom is a reasonable solution. At the very least, there need to be two competing protocols, should this group feel bound for more definition to allow the users and the market to decide what is good or not. But, my feeling is flexibility to allow all the ideas and more presented makes a compelling argument. -- Charles Krinke OpenSim Core Developer OSGrid Director
- [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Rob Lanphier
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Bill Humphries
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario David W Levine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base-00 Latha Serevi
- Re: [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base… Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Gener… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Frisby, Adam
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Christian Scholz