IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario

Rob Lanphier <robla@lindenlab.com> Thu, 12 March 2009 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <robla@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC91D28C0F4 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEgDZHJaCKwn for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tammy.lindenlab.com (tammy.lindenlab.com [64.154.223.128]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AA53A69B5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from synergy.local (synergy.lindenlab.com [10.1.23.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tammy.lindenlab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FA01414003; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49B940DF.8040009@lindenlab.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:35 -0700
From: Rob Lanphier <robla@lindenlab.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0903120735s5311a922ybbc40a30433166a3@mail.gmail.com> <49B934B9.3080408@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49B934B9.3080408@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:42 -0000

On 3/12/09 9:13 AM, Jon Watte wrote:
> For example, the assumption that client A can even talk to servers B
> and C seems to be totally implicit, but can't be assumed in the
> general world.

Yes, one can assume client A can talk to servers B and C if we actually
go about the work of defining a standard client-server protocol spelling
out how the client is expected to behave in that transaction.

Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email