Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEDF3A6987 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.349 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MN4COxi1S21g for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from po-out-1718.google.com (po-out-1718.google.com [72.14.252.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B583A6951 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id b23so706260poe.4 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gCqshA03WZCw+nIc3vwE7DOWb0rrB5AWvq+mzT/t08Q=; b=LFnnKm7TfRc4iSQ8G1X8mbkTZtZy6wzL3BhxYlzy2PyeKDF4y5sn8IW24r0sXNXYnL deDlB0+Ol7FzcUycsX4wHk8c37ILbc8NQKtkpBiAEqymF4mtyE0gh5VluzXFu09GooWZ 1d1+ZB1UYpTfMqWS628YS1WXXJWtKYRm2Wrio= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i4v1QG1la4WhQ4CLAzTWnkAmZMNOBhMVNXi8At1Zt0r3pqFsAHcuQQcYwpHKQjuDZo QRJTqD1v2rN9XM/ZRqEgMODEwIfBAyUOhIwenGZA3T4fe2UwBBja7ojxScmez0x0WxSh grsFh7xvOSmJxSp92pfxjbeoREzdGVNt/oNJQ= Received: by 10.141.99.2 with SMTP id b2mr744595rvm.182.1235022918448; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (svn.mindcontrol.org [69.17.45.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm522444rvb.0.2009.02.18.21.55.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499CF445.1000705@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:17 -0800 From: Jon Watte User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Olivares References: <1E40CE05-15D1-4970-9B0F-CD4AD11A074A@lindenlab.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FDC38@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <499C5415.7060400@cox.net> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FE124@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <2bd5b7f10902181356l64dd8366n2b5e57ef4242ae0f@mail.gmail.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FE4C3@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "mmox@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:55:06 -0000 Dan Olivares wrote: > objection that I've heard so far is that it requires a lot more work > (service calls?) to develop a shared scene graph and requires a > significant more amount of trust then an A-->B teleport does. > There is no shared scene graph. Each server simulates "its" objects, and translates from the "interop" protocol to its internal system at the gateway. Think of it like a more modern version of IEEE 1278 (which has been a great success as far as interoperable distributed simulation goes). Sincerely, jw