IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] OGP scalability concerns

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2009 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77163A681D for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vjvlifrJDdzZ for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E8E3A6917 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so616957rvb.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d3qwpbhzIeIBymjnhKGO4byCKc1jDbChLsOy3Oudxc0=; b=JRIhdrMVg50UYbPXJ/+PxietDFLKqVAtJL5CohqN4n8Ib6L+WwOne5OIrgedoG6UnB n/+ycrna8HvGtKllYaUXPpmv6ZkbeuQMV8gXKIFDoxKgd7odlIwWtaKOBSwpN37hxnz6 /7ur6SJgjo5H7yWzQ2RE3VULLvk0hifUJWoLU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uD48XhnKlGHGZwyG7lLlBxtwjKywkUKeWBO/imLKnglMUvuHT3KyuzG2k6lauccG3n frNH1OsUsy3TxakgDal1XaPHZevP6hrky+FWjjoKvvkvVKUCaTRxLMOn57hFPt/DZD7n 2PAVN27yAWv6R0H2qQjMHPnazESC1aSGFMTG8=
Received: by 10.140.132.3 with SMTP id f3mr76315rvd.21.1238689199579; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.10.111.233? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm3678919rvb.34.2009.04.02.09.19.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49D4E5AF.2030301@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:19:59 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D7B692E1B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <CD02023C-3E7B-4E76-8429-11035C827E53@lindenlab.com> <f0b9e3410904011701i2ccb03d4r1b48d33cfe3988ea@mail.gmail.com> <49D40A06.7030708@gmail.com> <8D793BD8-6AA2-49C7-96EF-435A5B449AA6@lindenlab.com> <49D4295C.2020502@gmail.com> <52A129B8-3FC6-486A-99A5-C00BED8BDE08@lindenlab.com>
In-Reply-To: <52A129B8-3FC6-486A-99A5-C00BED8BDE08@lindenlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] OGP scalability concerns
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:18:58 -0000

Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity) wrote:
> so maybe we might say "virtual world avatar interop" or "virtual world 
> event stream interop"?
>
> but not say "virtual world interop" 'cause it's too vague?
>

That's the gist of what I'm saying!

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email