Re: [mmox] xxSD working group?
Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Tue, 24 February 2009 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932CF3A6922 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:01:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sl0vDTopct5x for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:01:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (fed1rmmtao103.cox.net [68.230.241.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70C23A6403 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090224210142.FXUR4363.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:01:42 -0500
Received: from Macintosh.local ([72.200.120.202]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Kx1g1b00G4N6T0Q04x1gg3; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:01:40 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=Z8KEVYD-VSEweMoqA2gA:9 a=n2T1_QMgRWl4rTflX-1L7zuBe2QA:4 a=zUBsD6tbDSsA:10
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <49A46034.4080201@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:01:40 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
References: <ebe4d1860902240640u4e24ac2an5d4a2686286eb40e@mail.gmail.com> <49A40ADA.2080309@comlounge.net> <E319BEE7-1DA2-4474-A5AC-8934842B2E54@lindenlab.com> <49A456D4.3060602@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49A456D4.3060602@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] xxSD working group?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:01:24 -0000
Jon Watte wrote: > Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity) wrote: >> 3. the charter of this list is rather constrained... it is to attempt >> to standardize a protocol that is in wide use (for some definition of >> the term "wide".) it > > I thought we all agreed that the charter was *not* to standardize any > particular protocol currently in use, because that's an explicit > technology bias. > If that is actually the charter, then I know that a lot of people on > this list will have to withdraw. > > > Sincerely, > > jw > Does the IETF make up new protocols from scratch, generally? Thought "working/implemented code" was part of the deal. L
- [mmox] xxSD working group? Catherine Pfeffer
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Jon Watte