Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
"Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com> Fri, 13 March 2009 17:34 UTC
Return-Path: <infinity@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B138A3A6947 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Luc7wX+RIrqq for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tammy.lindenlab.com (tammy.lindenlab.com [64.154.223.128]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0D63A67F5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.99.107] (adsl-68-127-175-42.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.127.175.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tammy.lindenlab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C425D141400C; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <FDDE76F2-97AA-4350-9C13-60036958B875@lindenlab.com>
From: "Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com>
To: Bill Humphries <whump@lindenlab.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D6B85D0-1F70-4528-938C-2E1756FF2280@lindenlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:44 -0700
References: <e0b04bba0903120735s5311a922ybbc40a30433166a3@mail.gmail.com><49B934B9.3080408@gmail.com><49B940DF.8040009@lindenlab. com><e0b04bba0903130451v2d33f9ebxfa3b337513bf286c@mail.gmail.com><f0b9e3410903130912l5c5bc56ds10c6b45c0ca53efd@mail.gmail.com> <8D6B85D0-1F70-4528-938C-2E1756FF2280@lindenlab.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:34:08 -0000
which is to say... we're not adding new features to the OGP test grid, and probably won't 'til we more fully specify them and get feedback from our beta testers. during the course of last summer's beta, we learned a lot and received a fair amount of community input. submitting OGP to the IETF standardization process is part of the process of continuing OGP development. in short... we think the protocol for auth, teleport and event queue are fully baked. but... we want to get more input from the community ( especially from people who participate in last summer's beta and IETF "regulars" who may have more experience wedging things like OAuth / OpenID into existing protocols. ) and we want this process to take place in an IETF managed venue. and we're thinking that before we assign resources to add new features to the OGP test grid, we want to have a better idea of the end definition of these services. to recap... we want to get another round of commentary on the existing OGP drafts before adding new bits of code to the grid and to the viewer. and we want to have enough time for everyone (OpenSim, PyOGP, viewer developers, etc.) to receive and integrate new protocol definitions. -cheers -meadhbh On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Bill Humphries wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Charles Krinke wrote: > >> I have seen OGP work. I have also heard from a couple of folks that >> LL has >> stopped the test with the betagrid. If this is not true, please >> correct me. >> If it is true, may I suggest it might be to LL's advantage to start >> it up >> again and let folks use it. > > Charles, > > Linden Lab has been keeping the OGP agent server and regions up, but > not doing active development. > > --- > Whump Linden is Bill Humphries || whump@lindenlab.com || http://secondlife.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > mmox mailing list > mmox@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
- [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Rob Lanphier
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Bill Humphries
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario David W Levine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base-00 Latha Serevi
- Re: [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base… Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Gener… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Frisby, Adam
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Christian Scholz