Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Fri, 13 March 2009 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C093A69AA; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.843
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.843 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.755, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Ut1E6gg02ie; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFE03A65A5; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2DIcGr3016354; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:38:16 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2DIenvF181522; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:40:49 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2DIenAv010497; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:40:49 -0400
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2DIeno0010492; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:40:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <f0b9e3410903131119w11a4d8a0ha91c00ece76ebb01@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <OF692BD006.7F5E1FD0-ON85257578.006671FE-85257578.00669D61@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:40:48 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5|December 05, 2008) at 03/13/2009 14:40:48, Serialize complete at 03/13/2009 14:40:48
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00669D6185257578_="
Cc: mmox-bounces@ietf.org, MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:40:14 -0000
I'm also in the process of shaking out the bugs in a OGP complient AD for the OpenSim codebase. (built as an opensim servcie, cloned off of the user service) This will give us a second complete example of the design as well as a place to experiment with variations. - David W. Levine ~ Zha Ewry (ISL) Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com> Sent by: mmox-bounces@ietf.org 03/13/2009 02:19 PM To "Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com> cc MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org> Subject Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Thank you for correcting my mis-perception, Meadhbh (Infinity) that OGP is alive and well on the Linden end. I would urge folks to use it and test its capabilities and limits on an ongoing basis. Any implementations that are being used helps gain momentum and confidence in any implemented solution for interop so all of this is to our mutual advantage. Charles Krinke OpenSim Core Developer OSGrid Director On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity) < infinity@lindenlab.com> wrote: which is to say... we're not adding new features to the OGP test grid, and probably won't 'til we more fully specify them and get feedback from our beta testers. during the course of last summer's beta, we learned a lot and received a fair amount of community input. submitting OGP to the IETF standardization process is part of the process of continuing OGP development. in short... we think the protocol for auth, teleport and event queue are fully baked. but... we want to get more input from the community ( especially from people who participate in last summer's beta and IETF "regulars" who may have more experience wedging things like OAuth / OpenID into existing protocols. ) and we want this process to take place in an IETF managed venue. and we're thinking that before we assign resources to add new features to the OGP test grid, we want to have a better idea of the end definition of these services. to recap... we want to get another round of commentary on the existing OGP drafts before adding new bits of code to the grid and to the viewer. and we want to have enough time for everyone (OpenSim, PyOGP, viewer developers, etc.) to receive and integrate new protocol definitions. -cheers -meadhbh On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Bill Humphries wrote: On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Charles Krinke wrote: I have seen OGP work. I have also heard from a couple of folks that LL has stopped the test with the betagrid. If this is not true, please correct me. If it is true, may I suggest it might be to LL's advantage to start it up again and let folks use it. Charles, Linden Lab has been keeping the OGP agent server and regions up, but not doing active development. --- Whump Linden is Bill Humphries || whump@lindenlab.com || http://secondlife.com/ _______________________________________________ mmox mailing list mmox@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox _______________________________________________ mmox mailing list mmox@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox -- Charles Krinke OpenSim Core Developer OSGrid Director_______________________________________________ mmox mailing list mmox@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
- [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Rob Lanphier
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Bill Humphries
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario David W Levine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base-00 Latha Serevi
- Re: [mmox] My reading of draft-lentczner-ogp-base… Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Ann Otoole
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario eh2th-mmox
- [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Gener… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Frisby, Adam
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the G… Christian Scholz