Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 113

"dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com> Mon, 23 February 2009 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA6E3A6B16 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:45:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.221, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfxTF9Knv9tj for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:45:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com (outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com [64.136.55.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F6BF3A6AFA for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:45:55 -0800 (PST)
X-UOL-TAGLINE: true
Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (webmail16.vgs.untd.com [10.181.12.156]) by smtpout03.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABE4F2FPARGSVLA for <mmox@ietf.org> (sender <dyerbrookme@juno.com>); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:45:17 -0800 (PST)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: ireJTaFtV8IZgEqY8qAucSk4DgBsdYkNfB9/taeupQWrsRkx7xQqtQ==
Received: (from dyerbrookme@juno.com) by webmail16.vgs.untd.com (jqueuemail) id N94SUSYQ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:44:16 PST
Received: from [68.161.198.3] by webmail16.vgs.untd.com with HTTP: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:43:22 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [68.161.198.3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:43:22 +0000
To: gareth@litesim.com
X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0
Message-Id: <20090223.124322.6321.1@webmail16.vgs.untd.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-ContentStamp: 2:2:3004294952
X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.12.156|webmail16.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|dyerbrookme@juno.com
Cc: mmox@ietf.org, dyerbrookme@juno.com
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 113
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:45:56 -0000

>2 - My current favourite author makes a living through creative
commons licensed sci-fi novels, so yes - you can make a living without
a copyright monopoly, but that brings me back to point 1

Anecdotes and urban legends have no place in a scientific project.

There is no peer-reviewed scientific study proving that using the CC regime or offering everything full perms everywhere helps you make a living if you are not already subsidized by the state or private sector.

____________________________________________________________
Get the word out. Click here for professional brochure production!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTMQB83rtK9qCxy3deU5HJVBw4Zb4ShApzHbIu54U497WrtC2P53Xq/