IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 45

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Thu, 19 February 2009 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9DB3A6B0C for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:05:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFtAmQvZ4zY5 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442E3A6B02 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f33so376162fkf.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:05:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dJfFHwHhUjznIGGL71k7QKz+Otl3j7Mp3mXCLxnETJY=; b=qS+f6q8nALaGdH4YRcvPSpWp1ZirGXZVKTRZEhgM/Tc9Qib2w0e6U+uB5o7pSK48oN QVo2gRol1MkzGjCuVnvvKmv8CW9zvuBEbIc07Fv16QB8mPyTakZMOzEsZxaz6lGZR2ZR uddBQs9MyUdsrsE7GeeAtmWQyqxevly/Pca8I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nZRZKIJaihaVEuTZZQSMYwG5kfpNuAQ3acWDNgNrrmE/GDhVd3JfLIw4A0WZK5fE7z VwDUBmh8t7SUnf5K12gBUBuIVgm8GHwSkbVEAmAOxPa8O9fiG12EuivSRqT6rYlS+L35 w08FL3DQRSFl6K1HdQquQ+RWTZrbqAD4ru9Dg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.240.10 with SMTP id s10mr882280bkr.12.1235052341423; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:05:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <53cd6c2e0902190257u37e957e7se4f208975dfadd64@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090219.014758.23973.0@webmail04.vgs.untd.com> <53cd6c2e0902190257u37e957e7se4f208975dfadd64@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:05:41 +0000
Message-ID: <e0b04bba0902190605r35bb4e73l84a37f90a44bd61f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: mmox@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636c5a82616ee2c0463460837"
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 45
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:05:31 -0000

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jesrad <jesrad@gmail.com> wrote:

For months already I've been getting paid as an independant
> content provider in SL for creating full-perm works. I have the exact
> opposite claim to yours: my CC-like license cannot be enforced
> correctly due to the permissions system in SL, and that's disrupting
> my trade to a fortunately small extent, whenever someone buys stuff
> from me then slaps restrictions on it that are illegitimate. To me the
> permissions system is hampering the rights-model that I'm becoming
> reliant on for earning a living


That is very insightful, and shows just how hard this area really is.

I think we may have to examine permissions propagation from first
principles.  A mechanism that doesn't work properly within even a single
domain is clearly not the right one to endorse across multiple domains.

Morgaine.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status