Re: [mmox] xxSD working group?
Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Tue, 24 February 2009 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6223A6A1C for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVk-qoJzaWaK for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f163.google.com (mail-gx0-f163.google.com [209.85.217.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2B23A68CD for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so2771298gxk.13 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aixcP1FBbensbv/MliJkA59rQNzPETgzijBL4adyfGc=; b=otP2bEce4Z+dOdcgEJIaMWYraLs/jPidKTIi7PY18D+fvyrEUy5GiSHPVeqgcf6FPK /tU+/qer9kKy2QS3WodvlCH/6ERJNPvo0Kex9b4dlr1dCGmSDeNOAdNImh15O/Iz0Dla +WftDsKV+ey4OadcWHDO9um7MC4/HRJ7wNzzo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kDoj5iMNKgR4SN7s1kh1YRj2eaga30Cc33cnWD6cbh8Jp70cMJS8nZtKtVsSIBZiPP fus/4wWptM0fnl99Vr/uNbMAEDZTZLjyURbIBlQKmr0+wHUjfTSXVn6ydqQfGRuXywBg 0gDqFOVomkX1rhbpvg+KIMaCol02T4f7tn/UI=
Received: by 10.100.216.10 with SMTP id o10mr271731ang.86.1235510436334; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.109? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c29sm11767858anc.23.2009.02.24.13.20.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A464A1.1020506@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:20:33 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lenglish5@cox.net
References: <ebe4d1860902240640u4e24ac2an5d4a2686286eb40e@mail.gmail.com> <49A40ADA.2080309@comlounge.net> <E319BEE7-1DA2-4474-A5AC-8934842B2E54@lindenlab.com> <49A456D4.3060602@gmail.com> <49A46034.4080201@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <49A46034.4080201@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] xxSD working group?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:20:19 -0000
Lawson English wrote: > Does the IETF make up new protocols from scratch, generally? Thought > "working/implemented code" was part of the deal. > Sounds like I should formally propose our internal interoperability protocol, then. I'd rather not propose our implementation details as a standard, but instead work towards something that is more vendor neutral, though. Sincerely, jw
- [mmox] xxSD working group? Catherine Pfeffer
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] xxSD working group? Jon Watte