Re: [MMUSIC] WG adoption of other WebRTC data channel usage drafts?; Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02.txt

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECFC1A8707 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpA41MAs8q8h for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DFB1A8701 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3948; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444947825; x=1446157425; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hZzOqLrQ6Z5z9izMtvRnB+1O/ePos7T4d/8r+1WkKIE=; b=Iqt4ZnGv78E14AoP/4xVNX8sALWjNhCDtTIikVOzEWwh9BVxZdmhEpIb lZNijv7SwvNiPmd95CzoskebIaQ+9WI1/UhtXfHeYaqvpd6jFWD4+NAQl SHfPQesemh4arkOG+zos+bnZXVhs55JLwZ3bnOkP4SRGO1KJsXgfq+UDe k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAgDNJiBW/4MNJK1egyZUbr09AQ2BWRcMhTFKAoE8OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJwEBBAEBATUwBgkBEQsYCRYECwkDAgECARUwBgEMBgIBAQWIJQ3DZwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIZ2hH6EOwEBV4QuAQSND4kOhRmCcIUSgVhIg3KDAZJ9HwEBQoJEgVsiMwGEJoFAAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,687,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="37986175"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2015 22:23:44 +0000
Received: from [10.98.149.198] (bxb-fandreas-8815.cisco.com [10.98.149.198]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9FMNhvn020662; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:23:43 GMT
To: "Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)" <albrecht.schwarz@alcatel-lucent.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <786615F3A85DF44AA2A76164A71FE1ACDF796695@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56202783.3010300@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:24:03 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <786615F3A85DF44AA2A76164A71FE1ACDF796695@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/-nV-r_oe9aob1F7Qc-kzhQDM-WU>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WG adoption of other WebRTC data channel usage drafts?; Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:23:47 -0000

Hi Albrecht

In order for the WG to take on additional work and specific drafts, we 
generally require an expressed interest and support from the WG. We 
haven't seen a lot of that so far on these two drafts, so you may want 
to try and garner some additional interest and demonstrate that on the 
list and/or in the upcoming meeting (let us know if you would like 
agenda time to discuss these).

Thanks

-- Flemming (as MMUSIC chair)


On 10/6/15 3:47 AM, Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht) wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> like too remind that there are three first WebRTC data channel applications,
> 1) MSRP based instant messaging,
> 2) T.140 based text conversation and
> 3) BFCP based floor control within a WebRTC conference service.
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel was/is the precedent for getting a common understanding about application protocol specific SDP usage (on top of the generic control of a DC).
> The discussion and protocol design are fairly mature in the meanwhile, hence it is time to start the work on the two other applications.
> We've prepared initial drafts, derived from the "MSRP draft", see:
>
> T.140 Text Conversation over Data Channels
> draft-schwarz-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-02.txt
>
> BFCP floor control signalling over Data Channels
> draft-schwarz-mmusic-bfcp-usage-data-channel-01.txt
>
> We'd like to request MMUSIC for adoption of these drafts.
>
> Regards,
> Albrecht
>
>
>
> Re: [MMUSIC] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02.txt
>
> Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler <Juergen.Stoetzer-Bradler@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 09 September 2015 14:45 UTCShow header
>
> Hello,
>
> Version 02 of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel addresses Christian's comments to version 01,
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg14537.html,
> except for the "setup" attribute related one.
>
> We'll come back regarding the SDP setup attribute, which can be part of an MSRP over data channel
> related SDP media description as media level "a=setup" attribute and/or as MSRP sub-protocol specific
> attribute "a=dcsa:x setup".
>
> Thanks,
> Juergen
>
> On 09.09.2015 16:33, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:		draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel
>> Revision:	02
>> Title:		MSRP over Data Channels
>> Document date:	2015-09-09
>> Group:		mmusic
>> Pages:		15
>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel/
>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02
>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-02
>>
>> Abstract:
>>      This document specifies how the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)
>>      can be instantiated as a data channel sub-protocol, using the SDP
>>      offer/answer exchange-based generic data channel negotiation
>>      framework.  Two network configurations are documented: a WebRTC end-
>>      to-end configuration (connecting two MSRP over data channel
>>      endpoints), and a gateway configuration (connecting an MSRP over data
>>      channel endpoint with an MSRP over TCP endpoint).
>>
>>                                                                                     
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> .
>