Re: [MMUSIC] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04

[Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]>]

On 7/26/21 8:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> (Sorry, was on vacation.)
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Christer Holmberg 
> <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     >> I've reviewed the diff between this and RFC8843.  Looks good. 
>     Thanks for a good shepherd writeup too.  Just a couple of comments:
>     >> The registrations in Section 16 should make it clear they are
>     updating, not creating, the entries they describe.  RFC 8843
>     created them.
>     > Ok. I believe the authors can make that change later.
>
>     I am not really sure what the change would look like.
>
>     For example, if I do the following change in Section 16.1:
>
>     s/This document adds the MID SDES item to the IANA "RTP SDES Item
>     Types" registry as follows: /This document updates the MID SDES
>     item registered in RFC 8843 in the IANA "RTP SDES Item Types"
>     registry as follows
>
>     ...it seems like all the information is updated.
>
>
> That's pretty much what I'm looking for.
>
>     >> It would probably make things even smoother to indicate in the
>     shepherd writeup that RTCWEB reviewed this, so that their JSEP
>     update doesn't conflict with it.  (And if they didn't, please at a
>     minimum forward
>     >> them the IETF Last Call announcement when it comes out.)  I
>     know the writeup already describes the separation of work, but
>     we're likely to be asked to confirm that there was more
>     coordination than that.
>     > Good point. We did not have RTCWEB review the update per se,
>     however a couple of the people that reviewed it are intimately
>     involved in the RTCWEB work. Should we alert the RTCWEB group at
>     this point or wait until the IETF Last Call ?
>
>     As Flemming said, people that have reviewed BUNDLEbis are also
>     active in RTCWEB. In addition, when Flemming sent out the
>     publication request e-mail, I did forward it to the RTCWEB list.
>
>     As RTCWEB is meeting this week, I guess it can also be mentioned
>     there.
>
>
> It's probably fine to say in the shepherd writeup that there's 
> substantial overlap in the participants between RTCWEB and MMUSIC, 
> just to head off any questions ADs from other areas might have.

I have updated the shepherd write-up accordinlgy.

Thanks

-- Flemming

>
> -MSK