Re: [MMUSIC] Mismatch between sdp-bundle-negotiation and RFC5888

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 03 December 2018 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5CE130FE9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:31:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wT6qdlLXvnrz for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BD7130FE8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:31:04 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 12074411-57bff70000007049-ab-5c0568507509
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 89.0E.28745.058650C5; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:31:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id wB3HUfnx021635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:30:42 -0500
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <CAD5OKxskcj4aGBO6tDJJ+3YrzzdhvZJXZTkUg-_FDoOrR-Ovdg@mail.gmail.com> <FA5021E4-0707-4AD8-BB59-2412F2D38DE1@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxve9vWtzOZv6RtEgnJ0pt-z7jdT6QXsVoi_k2RXE2gdZA@mail.gmail.com> <7774BF2D-B39E-4632-9A19-C16D281767AF@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxtGNGQo8fMDVMLHAd2hKGKRSLDJvRpcfzfxadxhkJSR8w@mail.gmail.com> <F8D8E443-CBEA-4BBA-89F5-4D5AA812AD71@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxtFR0JXBjtGz2s62wCVYNq+no7cOmGDgYRwACyadDpVEw@mail.gmail.com> <937014FC-5072-4E00-8ABF-A2F9455D5224@ericsson.com> <883bd6f9-ff9b-ec4b-ab20-affe270bdce1@comcast.net> <CAD5OKxuf2CvFbtpnE+OrMqPsv7j8q8eLhpU85teiUMUGQxKYMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <1132b610-703c-4a07-8eb7-9d8463afae37@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:30:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxuf2CvFbtpnE+OrMqPsv7j8q8eLhpU85teiUMUGQxKYMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrBIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqBuRwRpjMPsFr8XU5Y9ZLGZcmMrs wOSxZMlPJo9bUwoCmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MmZ+vMZaMIOtYuHbZ4wNjJdZuhg5OCQETCQO flfrYuTiEBI4yCRxZMksRgjnAZPEtxe9zF2MnBzCAp4Sna8uMIHYIgKqEn+/TwazmQXkJc5O v8UE0fCTRWLLyVXsIAk2AS2JOYf+s4DYvAL2Ei/WTWQDsVkEVCS2370EViMqkCbxt3MJI0SN oMTJmU/A6jkFAiUm7lnMDLHATGLe5odQtrjErSfz4RY3b53NPIFRYBaS9llIWmYhaZmFpGUB I8sqRrnEnNJc3dzEzJzi1GTd4uTEvLzUIl1TvdzMEr3UlNJNjJAAFtzBOOOk3CFGAQ5GJR5e BwfWGCHWxLLiytxDjJIcTEqivCuDgEJ8SfkplRmJxRnxRaU5qcWHGCU4mJVEeAsKWWKEeFMS K6tSi/JhUtIcLErivMwme6OEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgsjIcHEoSvP/SgIYKFqWmp1akZeaUIKSZ ODhBhvMADa9IBqrhLS5IzC3OTIfIn2JUlBLn3e0KlBAASWSU5sH1whLMK0ZxoFeEeT1Sgap4 gMkJrvsV0GAmoME5W5hABpckIqSkGhiL3LZd7n6afy9xekRW+6X0yW/O6gfK/837uuSzuLDv P7N0DqEExfjtk2bun6PRsaZp76+zL2Kdr8/IOh16QnzqT9s1/i4sH7fwJifOkrfTDnGx2OV3 7n7sxZDG+X8kpSs2qneU//I/Lnl+YhfjC6Ylz2+mKr3p/TT55w3hrfaTb23hXHyQ0zJAiaU4 I9FQi7moOBEA4XF29QsDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/1P1jLnG4nQZGj4Drbinrel02mxc>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Mismatch between sdp-bundle-negotiation and RFC5888
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:31:15 -0000

On 12/2/18 7:45 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 2:51 PM Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net 
> <mailto:paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>> wrote:
> 
>     On 12/2/18 1:57 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>      > I guess my question to the chairs/ADs is whether we could implement
>      > Roman’s suggestion without having to take the document back to
>     the WG etc.
> 
>     Couldn't this be done with a *new* draft that update 5888 in this way?
> 
> 
> This can be done as an update to RFC 5888 but we will be changing a 
> single phrase there. Unless there are other things we need to update 
> there, I do not think a whole new bis would make sense.

Yes, just a draft that makes this change, not a bis. It would be a very 
small draft.

	Thanks,
	Paul